I'm guessing what you mean is that houses require upkeep and they also come with certain benefits (e.g. more freedom with what you do with the house), but I'm wondering if you meant something different?
7 karma · joined September 5, 2016
I'm guessing what you mean is that houses require upkeep and they also come with certain benefits (e.g. more freedom with what you do with the house), but I'm wondering if you meant something different?
I have a vague memory that they also made similar statements, but I tried to find evidence of that recently and couldn’t find a source. I’d appreciate anybody that could link me to a source if they have it on hand / find one.
I’m much more inclined to blame maladaptive behaviors on systemic failures to educate people and to provide them opportunity than I am to blame individuals.
Sure, in every system with live agents there will be bad actors and those with poor behavior, but when the system is overrun with examples of this, perhaps it’s the system we should be looking at, not individuals.
i actually can’t tell if you’re 1. sarcastic 2. trolling 3. honestly believe this 4. engaging in self deception to rationalize your own behavior
check it out, super neat number thy stuff! https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.00735
It is different from regular algebra in the sense that often one starts with a set and operation one supposes to have a particular kind of property (perhaps it's a group, or perhaps it's a field, or perhaps it's a certain kind of field (maybe separable, or local, or ...)). Then from these assumptions one proves facts about the assumed algebraic structure.
It's different in that often particular elements aren't of much interest, and it's not as tied down to a particular context.