413 karma · joined May 25, 2009
it's still growing, but seems to be a viable alternative to macports
!!:s/sl/ls
executes last command but replaces first occurence of sl with ls. (can also be written as ^sl^ls) !!:gs/sl/ls
same as above, but now global replaceHence the music you buy is protected by this law.
Hence you can not ask the author to get a spare cd. Since he's not obliged to give you one. Also everything you want to do with the music is determined by the law.
[1] i am talking about the law that protects original creations, not the one where you have to pay for a patent.
Content is to be discussed, not style
http://github.com/mxcl/homebrew/tree/ is a package manager that tries to do just that
Very clever indeed
class Fixnum
def +(other)
42
end
end
3 + 2 => 42point me to a page that only displays those 2 updates as the main features. In my browser Apple is clearly marketing the 64-bit, Grand Central Dispatch and OpenCL as the main reasons to upgrade.
Also stop referring to an OS upgrade as a service pack. Because it isn't. Microsoft releases service packs, just like Apple releases minor updates to their OS, (eg. 10.5.7)
that is untrue, Apple doesn't care if you violate copyright. They consider the violated party to handle that deal. (example: there was a blatant ripoff of mario, it was not by nintendo and still made it on the appstore)
no it hasn't. You can't do
public method(String name = "test") {...}
in JavaAm I the only one who heard the rumor that we have enough nukes to destroy humanity 8 times?
With a desktop app, you're in control of your own machine.
* your account gets compromised, your password is saved in plaintext, etc...
* their servers are down, you want to work on a Word doc, edit an image. To bad, you can't because the app itself is down
* not everybody has constant internet connectivity.
* Webapps can never be as powerful as a desktop application.
I actually liked this article just because it contains more truth than "The case against apple". I don't understand why everybody reacted to "The case against apple" with agreement and now they decide that a counterpost is pointless.
If you didn't like the article, please just ignore it instead of posting a comment like that.