Planet Calacanis
marco.org
marco.org
Sundays are always the slowest news days.
I hate to be a back seat webmaster but the time might be coming where HN has to split the Internet Memes and the Content Posts just to keep the later from being overrun completely (which is basically where we are now)
A one line filter rule in the profile would do nicely.
I actually liked this article just because it contains more truth than "The case against apple". I don't understand why everybody reacted to "The case against apple" with agreement and now they decide that a counterpost is pointless.
If you didn't like the article, please just ignore it instead of posting a comment like that.
-Eleanor Roosevelt
There's certainly too much discussing people lately...
"And which freedoms? The freedom to break Apple’s DRM? The freedom for Palm to violate the USB spec by identifying the Pre with a different vendor ID?"
Palm wasn't actually breaking any DRM, and changing the vendor id was the only way they could make their software inter-operate well. I understand that Palm and Apple are huge competitors, but very rarely do people defend such blatant attempts at platform lock-in. I wouldn't call him a apologist, but it definitely feels reactionary to Calacanis's points.
Compare apple.com and apple.co.uk.
It runs on multiple devices, like the Nintendo DS, and other non-smartphone mobile devices.
It totally dominates all other mobile browsers in real-world stats -- people actually use it, and that's what's important. Opera's piddling marketshare in terms of actual usage (along with their historically odd JS engine, and mobile reformatting proxy) has meant that major players (like Google) totally ignored their browsers for years.
Saying that Mobile Safari dominates mobile browsing seems a bit self-defeating -- of course Safari is going to dominate if the iPhone is the crowd favourite for mobile web browsing and Apple only allows one browser on the iPhone.
My question is whether or not those mobile-browser statistics would change very much if Apple allowed 3rd-party browsers on the iPhone.* Then we'd get a good idea of how good Mobile Safari is.
* Let's get this out of the way straight-up: Apple doesn't have to allow another browser into the store, but I'm proposing a hypothetical scenario in which they do.
I don't see anything new or shocking in the behavior with the iPhone or ipod, either from Apple, or the user community who has purchased them.
Same song, new day...
If we're talking 2000s, then that's a totally different story.
Modifying hardware on a desktop is much easier then on a phone. That the hardware is proprietary isn't nearly as big of a deal here. Its all embedded, can't really be upgraded anyway.
Using a different OS isn't that big of a deal either. PreOS won't run on it, Android won't fully support iPhone's features, and why should Apple waste resources making their OS run on hardware they don't support?
Now, if you wanted to complain about the App Store policies being bad, thats a valid complaint. But not proprietary hardware.
The point I'm making is that they are control freaks, always have been and it's not new. They want absolute control over their brand.
I'm okay with that. It's their company. But I don't like their closed-ness, so I don't buy their closed products.
I actually did buy a macbook pro though, precisely because it was more open than a PC -- it'll run windows or mac OS and that I like.
# SEO is bullshit
# Blogging is dead
# Mahalo is Web 3.0
etc. etc. etc.