1,074 karma · joined May 3, 2021
Portions of what you mentioned seem like reasonable concerns to the average layperson
No they don’t. Most of this earth is seeking food and clean water and substance. You’re lucky enough to have that and seek your social relevance
While I don’t disagree, I expect there’s a substantially equivalent number of grifters under socialism as well
I question it. You’re too confident here. How much money would he lose? Is it measurable? A blip?
And how much increased revenue would be gained by his supporters? Does it even out?
How many people doing the canceling have never bought from the company, nor would ever?
> Bloodlines of the Illuminati by Fritz Springmeier
These two were the most interesting on the list to me. Not sure why he cared about the first , but the second (and other titles about conspiracies) is really strange to me. Has anyone here read that book?
This isn’t an either-or binary thing, both can contribute to a toxic platform and mistrust. Censorship and cancel culture and bad actors and venomous users all contribute a part
Edit: in the Russian case, they also changed their appearance to match
According to a sibling comment, this strategy goes back to JohnF Kennedy at least. Except that the Russians take it to the next level
Is there somewhere you can suggest that I can read more about this notion?