657 karma · joined October 30, 2012
I help scale enterprise software businesses. Currently CFO @ Ambient.ai.
Previously, TrueAccord, Productboard, Treasure Data (acq ARM), 42Floors(acq Knotel), DataPad (acq Cloudera), BackOps, Helpshift, and Crittercism (acq VMWare).
Drop the m from my user name [at] GOOG’s email service
1) the bottom 90%, 2) the next 9.9%, 3) the top 0.1%
This thinking was informed by: https://amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/559130/
Huge proponent of “the price you see is the price you pay”.
IMHO, this “capability” speaks to the level of engineering excellence of this company/product.
I've owned a Tesla for the last 6 months. Here's my experience:
* It charges at home, begining the charge at 12:30AM just after the rates drop. It charges to ~240 miles of range.
* For the 4 days I've wanted to go futher, charged upto 100% and that solved my problem 2 of the 4.
* Other 2 days, I stopped at a charger along my way on a road trip. there was a place to grab food and take a walk. 25 minutes later on was back on the road. No biggie. -- I don't need or want a swapable battery. Rather have a better engineered car that doesn't have this engineering requirement.
I'd assume 99% of Tesla owners would agree.
Along with FLoC, a continued march towards Google’s interest, not your interests.
How did you come to this conclusion?
I believe in consequences, but I am neither a professional educator nor a veteran of any armed forces. I would defer to the head of this institution to arrive at an appropriate decision.
If it was owned by the city, restricting access would be different.
^^^^Appears incorrect. It’s city owned! Thanks for digging!!
lay-off = terminating employment relationship.
https://web.archive.org/web/19991021233828/http://www.portma...
XXXX,
Yeah....We need to have a conversation and push back on them-
IMHO, Segments pricing starts breaking down as company's scale because of a couple factors, that generally allow people to push back.
Some of these reasons (that I know of...and I'm sure you know better), are:
1. Google tag manager is free
2. Many services, like Marketo, don't allow Segment to use their universal javascript widget...so you end up using Segment as a tag manager to push that provider's proprietary widget...reducing the value of Segment. In fact, if you look at the "www." side of our website, we could directly instrument 2 sdk's and remove segment (so net +1 javascript library) and dump segment all together. This would also significantly reduce the unique people count...how they bill!
3. We'll soon have a full-time front engineer focused on the website...So it's not very painful to instrument a new sdk, or add a shared cookie between sdk's.
4. There are options that are really good at moving log files (e.g., fluentd.org) for server side logging. It's how the big boys move log files :)
5. According to google analytics...we're at XX,XXX across webapp + www, so not sure why they are saying YYY,YYY
I realize there's value in Segment, but we can push back on pricing increases.
One last thing, allowing us access to our historic pricing, with no additional functionality, doesn't seem like a big give...especially as pricing usually reduces as you scale. So I am very skeptical of this "new pricing" line of reasoning they are trying to pull!
Looking forward to talking to them ~N
IMHO, Intercom has excellent fit for early stage go-to-markets, but gets ripped out by specialized tools, purpose built and sold to line function (marketing, sales, support, etc)