This isn't entirely accurate, there is a private clearing house that supports instant payments in the United States.
https://www.theclearinghouse.org/payment-systems/CHIPS https://www.theclearinghouse.org/payment-systems/rtp
14 karma · joined June 28, 2021
This isn't entirely accurate, there is a private clearing house that supports instant payments in the United States.
https://www.theclearinghouse.org/payment-systems/CHIPS https://www.theclearinghouse.org/payment-systems/rtp
What ended up working for us was just keeping consistent & simple responses to the usage questions, and whenever we received a rejection with a valid concern, we'd address it at the top of our existing response with something like "In response to the latest rejection: ...". Unfortunately it seems unless you get a competent reviewer, you're out of luck, so just keep submitting as soon as rejection comes in and eventually you'll get through.
So why wouldn't you keep them? If you're able to produce even more with AI enabled engineers, why downsize? To me, it sounds like a startup's dream to be able to output more without increasing headcount.
Both, the bill lists any "website, desktop application, mobile application, or augmented or immersive technology application that is operated, directly or indirectly" by ByteDance, which controls CapCut and Lemon8.