It would be similar to criticizing the first ever bridge builders that they don’t use their own yet under-construction bridge for constructing that bridge, and instead transport their construction materials on water.
138 karma · joined October 8, 2012
It would be similar to criticizing the first ever bridge builders that they don’t use their own yet under-construction bridge for constructing that bridge, and instead transport their construction materials on water.
I’m just asking all that, I’m myself relying on intuition a lot, but I feel like I always have a communication barrier when all I have is intuition; i.e. how do I explain my reasoning/decisions if all the risks and potentially positive outcomes are just weights in my head (that’s what I imagine intuition is)
From my side the only thing I wished to have once I clicked on the first link is if there were links to de-paywalled websites (I guess Pocket works for that, or webarchive).
You know, consuming calories is immensely beneficial and good for your body if you haven’t had a meal for a day. Doesn’t really matter if it’s refined grains or whatever.
Consuming some vitamin-rich whatever is healthy for you if you’re low on those vitamins, otherwise it’s calories and a bunch of work for your liver.
There’s stuff that is objectively bad for your health, almost no matter the circumstances. Like some fried sugar-rich dessert, unless you’ve been starving for a few days it’s probably going to be bad for you on all accounts.
This hits very close! Will have a look at this for sure, thanks.
From 100 years ago most of the houses that you see are either stone/brick houses, or timber-framed houses (thick post and beam, not what people in the UK call timber framing today). Those houses are always impressive compared to todays 2”x4” frames
I think this is very much subjective in the end though. Also because current building techniques still make use of stone, bricks and concrete which all have the same downsides. But as you said they can be an overkill for some people who don’t mind the walls being quite soft for instance.
On another note I’m using Tailscale and it’s a wonderful service and I get it for free.
The paper is talking about a compound (two compound candidates) that inhibit binding of two proteins: AEG-1 (encoded by MTDH) and SND1, those compounds do that by binding to either AEG-1’s or SND1’s site where otherwise SND or AEG-1 would have bind, and they likely do this with stronger bond than SND1 and AEG1 would have had.
So in short, this compound does not leave you without some vital protein but disrupt formation of some bonds with SND1 protein.