4,711 karma · joined September 5, 2012
I like the idea of sharing, but unless all the ducks are in a row someone is bound to get hurt, and it's not clear to me if the proposed legal statement is sound.
To clarify: I don't mean to disparage him, but acquisitions have to bring some sort of value to the acquirer.
This isn't about subsequent redistribution (and if it were, I'd agree with your skepticism). The primary distribution must also follow the terms.
You can't cherrypick which parts of the license you wish to follow.
If you want a C analogy, saying "LICENSE: GPL" or "LICENSE: MIT" is like dealing with a void *.
Relevant part:
Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this
software for any purpose with or without fee is hereby
granted, *provided that the above copyright notice and
this permission notice appear in all copies.*"I’ve also raised a bunch of cash from some of the people I respect most in the industry. This includes: Marc Andreessen, Peter Thiel, Tony Hsieh, Zach Nelson, Andrew Anker, Chris Dixon, Saul Klein, Josh Kopelman, Jeff Jordan and Matt Cohler, all investing as individuals. Also investing are a handful of seed funds including the CrunchFund, Greylock Discovery Fund, Accel’s Seed Fund, Menlo Ventures Talent Fund, Lerer Ventures, SV Angels and Ooga Labs."
Not necessarily. Dick Cheney had financial interests in Halliburton, which benefited greatly thanks to the Iraq War. I imagine Bush had much the same (or if not him directly, then family), which would make the Iraq war a brilliant move for his pocketbook.
ROTC was only allowed on campus recently:
"Yale, Harvard and Columbia all signed agreements this year [2011] to bring back ROTC"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/23/rotc-ivy-league_n_1...
It's tough to do ROTC when you have to go to another campus every week.
It's not that there aren't sharp people at less prestigious schools, but that there are generally more at more prestigious schools.
There is some desired heterogeneity of intellect. Elite Colleges aren't just looking for sharp mathematicians. They want to attract sharp physicists, sharp philosophers, sharp linguists, sharp artists, sharp musicians, sharp poets etc.
Now, in my experience there is a set of areas in which asians excel, but that doesn't comprise 100% of all areas. There are many areas where predominantly white people dominate.
If you weight the distribution of ethnic origin along those lines, I suspect asians will be underrepresented relative to the distribution measured by SAT scores.
I assume you didn't go to an Ivy League school. Most of the people who are there by academic merit genuinely are at the top of their academic year/class. If you can handle it, you can take math classes with IMO medalists, chemistry classes with IChO medalists, etc. And this holds true for most departments.
I remember ordering once (this was 7 years ago) at $5-$7 a tee and USPS charged around 2.75 at the time, for a grand total closer to $10
But I think the soundtrack was seen by Braff as a Big Deal, which is probably why it shows up at a lower price point ($20) than the tee.
(and yes, techcrunch rings in at 15, and almost all of their content is garbage)
"To calculate the exchange rate for US Dollars, we pull up-to-the-minute BID prices from three exchanges. We take the 2 that are closest together and toss out the third, so that a bad feed from one exchange will not affect our calculation. Of the 2 rates that remain, Bit-Pay uses the highest BID price as our exchange rate. "
Companies don't end up changing prices every minute. Gas stations, for example, are prohibited from changing prices too frequently in many states.
A proper solution has to provide more than one minute of price stability. BitPay doesn't provide longer term price stability.