niceairport

It isn't a complete model, but it's the best one we've got and the most universally agreed upon.

I know you're joking, but "before" the Big Bang doesn't really make sense.

I can't say I'm surprised, but it's still pretty crazy to think about that it took us 44 years to get an object to a place it takes light less than 24 hours to get to. It feels both pretty far and also not far at all at the same time.

Curious as to how long does it take for the transmission to reach earth. Where can I learn that?

It doesn't seem to work when I paste text. After pasting text into the modal and submitting it prompts me to enter Wavenet API key.

Ah yes, the Simpsons, the source of truth for all things life.

At least the delusion is very real here.

I have mixed feelings between your response and the response you are replying to. One one hand I can clearly see how what you're saying makes sense. On the other, I still am inclined to believe that if you really distilled the actual purpose of everything you mentioned, it could be formulated in a way that doesn't require AGI.

You've explained further proving that the original statement was wrong. Nobody is shooting at anyone.

I think this is a bit of a case of "Why use many word when few word do trick?"

I've had the pleasure of working with an Australian consulting firm - Industrie & Co.

Great people and great experience overall.

I mean to be fair, the opinion expressed in the tweet in question was pretty dumb.

This. I was so sad to find out that despite having a phenomenal CSS support, FF does not (easily) allow to switch off CORS, which makes it impossible for me to use at work.

"The point is that you start to think how your words could be taken, not just assume people magically know your intent"

But where do you draw the line? Is it not reasonable to assume that the intent will be understood when using and extremely common phrase?

I mean your point is fair enough. But I must say that if someone is going to go to the trouble of deconstructing every sentence in search of something to be hurt by then I'm sure they can. Question is though, what's the point of it, when it is pretty clear that it was not the intended meaning? Because obviously in this example it was just used as a metaphore without any insidious meaning behind it. Not unlike the use of master in git or white/ black list, that I've seen discussed in HN a few times in the past months.

That's true. Maybe something to do with regulations then? HSBC is already being accused of being involved with money laundering quite a lot. Also, what other coins except BTC have market cap >1T?

Maybe they have issues with people taking on a margin that they cannot afford? Cryptocurrencies being as volatile as they are shorting them on a margin can result in high losses that HSBC prefers not to be involved with? Just a guess.

Thank you for adding that /s at the end. Nowadays it really wouldn't surprise me to see something like this written seriously.

Unfortunately, I think this is where it's headed and it doesn't look like there's a whole lot we can do. People ignored it years ago when they thought it would only be localised to liberal university circles in the US. Now those people are out in the world and there's little we can do to stop the spread of this witch hunt.

Or just think about all options as being prefixed with a "-"

For example you can calculate how many percent of their revenue a company made in a given country and then how much tax they paid there and demand them to pay the difference.

Maybe, once a post has been created you could show a message stating exact datetime on which the post will be deleted?

My guess would be it largely depends on the devs in question. I also feel like this is true regardless of language.

While I agree that it looks sleek, it also made my 2019 MBP lag slightly on load, which... just shouldn't happen.

One, I suppose.

"Is this real or parody?"

I feel like in 2021 it doesn't even matter anymore.

citation?

The vast majority of global civilian population doesn't have access to firearms.

I think README's purpose isn't to be entertaining. As such, I really don't see an issue with the linked README.

Vice has always been hit and miss for me. On one hand you have some really well produced documentaries, such as Hamilton's Pharmacopeia, the great reports on Ukrainian Protests or Xinjiang camps.

On the other hand you have stuff like this: https://www.vice.com/en/article/gy8pxm/gluten-free-people-ar...