32 karma · joined August 19, 2011
Btw, the fact that you suggested that book made me understand how much the current way Amazon suggest you books doesn't really take in consideration your goals or background.
It should actually ask you "Why are you buying this book?" Me "Because I want to make a startup" AMZ "Oh cool, what's you background?" Me "I am hacker" AMZ "Oh ok then with Seth Godin you are going a little bit too businessy. Try Start Small, Stay Small"
Sorry guys, early morning thoughts.
I know that sometimes he's maybe too motivational but I believe he has a brilliant mix of talking and doing. Squidoo is a great hack to raise money for charities; same for the Domino Project to re-think the publish industry; and the work he is doing for Acumen Fund is really inspiring
In this case, my humble advice is to not care if you don't have the skills. Start doing and you will learn. By "doing" I mean even the smallest thing: start a blog about what you want to do (I am sure you can do that), create a Facebook group to involve people and then evolve from there. If you are really excited about what you want to do you will find people ready to help you along the way. So don't worry if you don't have the skills to create something. You can still be good at engaging other people, the ones with the skills you need.
I personally think that being aware of your own strenghts and weaknesses is very important for every entrepreneur.
Howard Schultz, founder of Startbucks, many years ago said the best advice he got was to "Hire the skills you don't have" (http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/...)
Add the learning part when you are already making. You will understand much more. When Facebook was getting bigger young Zuck started to read Peter Drucker's essays. And I am sure those pages where really teaching him a lot because he already did some much. They were not theoretical notions.
Hope I am answer your question.
As pg points out: "One of the things I always tell startups is a principle I learned from Paul Buchheit: it's better to make a few people really happy than to make a lot of people semi-happy." (http://paulgraham.com/13sentences.html)
Regarding the fact that they are all "we are the x of y of z" and seem derivative, pg says:
"One good trick for describing a project concisely is to explain it as a variant of something the audience already knows. It's like Wikipedia, but within an organization. It's like an answering service, but for email. It's eBay for jobs. This form of description is wonderfully efficient. Don't worry that it will make your idea seem "derivative." Some of the best ideas in history began by sticking together two existing ideas no one realized could be combined." (http://ycombinator.com/howtoapply.html)
Why didn't you accept our application?
Strange as it may sound, the better your application was, the less likely there is to be an answer to this question. So don't take it personally. The fact is, even the best investors are quite bad at picking winners. VC firms consider themselves to be doing well if 4 out of 10 companies they fund succeed.