795 karma · joined January 11, 2021
Just amazing engineering push, the competition got the message and we benefit.
“Science is not a process, a credential, or an institution. It is the unflinching pursuit of truth, carried out by the few, co-opted by the many.”
When did we start institutionalizing it? How about letting the truth be bent? What about the focus on consensus? That’s also what lead to the current situation.
Just a simple example: when you play with firm biological facts, you might just open it all up to being bent. But then, wasn’t that maybe the goal all along?
- reliance on US technologies is not so good, but on Chinese is not discussed, just chosen
- environmental cost is of concern
- so are the energy costs
In the end, there are some clear tips on how to configure the LLM, but overall the article is a bit thin and rather biased.
And don’t lecture me about the many, for the many wouldn’t have started it, they joined the one.
You know the one, cherish him.
Thanks!
Btw, do you think going ad hominem changes anything?
“Never been done before – xAI did in 19 days what everyone else needs one year to accomplish.”
He’s a twat? What are your credentials?