neoromantique

>The EU is so incredibly hostile to small business and FOSS.

It's not EU being hostile, but rather US being incredibly lax(to put it mildly) about privacy issues, so that we even consider these violations a norm.

That and the obvious narrative pushing of whataboutism and Russian apologism.

Considering your comment history -- good job NameCheap.

Testing positive months after does happen, but is extremely rare, and yes, missing few days of school/work is not that big of a deal considering risks involved.

Many ubuntu-*desktop* users don't need compiler, and since they were intended target audience ubuntu doesn't include it, after all if you need the compiler is it that painful to run `apt install -y build-essential`?

How often do they exhibit symptoms AND trigger a PCR test?

Let's agree to disagree, I think in the end it comes down to priorities and pain threshold for having to tinker with stuff.

There are plenty of CVEs in brand name things across IoT spectrum.

Vetting devices you introduce to network is of course solid advice, but a little bit of paranoia never hurts in tech.

>After all, aren't 99% of home networks 'unsafe' according to your definition?

Prevailance of home ip addresses in DDoS attacks and in proxy pools does suggest so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

+1

I heard some horror stories with new ubiquiti gear, but my ERPoE router has been serving me gbit and PoE for AP since 2016 and 0 issues, it even handles WireGuard using some hoops.

But what's the alternative? Unsafe home network where one rogue device can act as a tunnel for bad actors(bots more often tbh)?

Said issue is indeed in the screenshot I provided, and it still is not "After that wasn't enough and people kept pestering him" as it was indeed a separate issue and not "a technicality".

Some people take their freedoms seriously and "Libre" version of the app mentioning tracking in ToS is a big no-no.

From what I can see the author just dismissed two valid (and separate) issues on the matter that he does not care about it, it's his right, but in no way it was "pestering" or "harassing".

I am not making it harder for the author, nor have I posted it on HN. And person that has posted it on HN has linked to FDroid issue tracker, not projects GitHub link.

>If you were personally insulted

I'm fine, reason why I posted reply is because top comment called creating an issue on a public issue tracker "show[ing] up and harass[ing] the developer". Hence my reply that the only harassment(however mild) I saw was from the developer himself, as per his right, but it still goes against the comment I was replying to.

>Why the entitlement to have the project do the work for you?

Because I for example consider a good tone at least giving upstream a heads up before forking and cutting out pieces of it.

There's nothing entitled about creating an issue on a public issue tracker that author can disable or limit at any time.

Author took his time to get this into F-Droid in the first place and references the F-Droid link on their repo, what is so zealous about creating the issue to make sure it stays there?

>After that wasn't enough and people kept pestering him

That's false? https://i.imgur.com/EFIfxRF.jpg

>Freedom cuts both ways, both for the user and the developer.

Author is free to call people "zealots", others are free to see it as being a dick.

It was simply uncalled for, if author does not want to deal with this he could've stopped replying after closing the issue as "Won't Fix", instead he decided to insult people that care about the free software.

The guy decided to upload his project to GitHub and make it public, there was nothing in the initial issue that would warrant the response it did.

Author is free not to remove ToS, but he doesn't have to be a dick about it.

~~I don't see harrasment there, dev is free to do as he wishes with his app, but there's nothing wrong with bringing it up. What is not okay is being a dick and calling people "zealots" over it.~~

EDIT: I didn't see the further replies that happened after this was posted on HN. I misunderstood and referred to creation of the issue itself.

Russia has already demonstrated that McDonald's theory doesn't work.

The biggest driving force behind NATO enlargement was always Russia. Who knew that if you threaten countries with war they will want to join a defensive alliance.

That's okay, time for negotiations has long passed.

Important to note that Vladimir Pozner has remained quiet ever since the beginning of the war.

ChatGPT is not really meant for summarizing things, Kagi Summarizer for example:

"This article discusses the dangers of ChatGPT, a large language model, and how it is used to generate 'bullshit' and propagate existing power structures. It argues that the model is harmful and that its plausibility makes it even more dangerous. The article also highlights the exploitative labour practices that go into maintaining the model, as well as the underlying supremacist perspectives that are embedded in AI. The author suggests that instead of embracing AI, we should focus on centring activities of care and search for alternatives to algorithmic immiseration."

It's even harder with surround setup.

How do you measure your productivity? Personally my working hour after a walk or a nap is much more productive than anything I could ever achieve in the office.

I've been doing full remote for six years now and it's wonderful, especially when you have good asynchronous workflows in your team to rid of "working hours" concept entirely. (Though possibility of that heavily depends on the role and team composition).

As almost everywhere in the world.

Enrolling into military is a choice and you know risks beforehand, there’s nothing about that choice that deserves worship-like cult status military has in US.

Well, in police scanner example, problem people have with it is not its efficacy, but rather other surrounding concerns (like privacy).

So the analogy doesn't hold up because computer does it more efficiently?