204 karma · joined July 29, 2017
We have two open spots in the founding team for a B2C edtech startup founded by Oxford and IIT Delhi grads going after a $200B market.
Our mission is to enable a billion+ people to learn, teach, and connect better.
We are post-MVP, pre-launch. We are fundraising starting April and expecting to close the round before July. As the founders shift focus towards fundraising, we are opening up two positions for founding engineers to take over the product.
What we are looking for
Essential Skills
- You have experience in building apps based on React.js, Node.js and Postgres. - You have a bias towards shipping fast and an an eye for design - You are obsessive about documentation and writing readable code - You take full ownership of the work
Good To Have Skills
- Experience with cloud deployment with services like AWS - Prototyping and Design skills
To know more, visit: https://merciful-justice-b9c.notion.site/Founding-Engineer-C...
Please send your resume and github profile to cambridgeinnovationlabs@gmail.com and we’d reach out to you. For any further questions, please write to us.
Living under fear of being shot over an argument or your children being shot in school shootings or living where paedophiles or sex abuse runs amok in top institutions (Larry Nassar, Sandusky/Sports, Epstein/Hollywood, Clinton/Trump/Politics are just some high profile examples) or being screwed by inflated healthcare costs is also not most people's ideas of a good life, but no one here seems to be mocking American culture.
And hundreds of millions of Indians are perfectly happy with their lives in India, so it can be "most" people's ideas of a good life.
"habits of mind", "tools of thought", "force multiplier", "superpowers" "embrace fear" etc. reads straight out from a Tim Ferris-like self-help book targetting millennials than anything a senior engineer would write.
I read your last year's post - that one was much more useful and insightful. So +1 (upvote) to more of those.
"They literally can't imagine a true statement that would get them in trouble." would be replaced by "They literally cannot image a statement which is morally acceptable to certain groups of people (to which they belong) would get them in trouble with those groups of people". Which is completely fair and reasonable.
Paul Graham is somewhat a victim of this himself.
For example, the assumption behind this very essay is that there is such a thing as a rigid, singular concept of "truth" in the moral, cultural and political sphere, that there is a "fact of the matter" whether a belief (say one PG holds) is correct or not. Or that that we live in a static world where such truths can even exist, and not, in a fluid, dynamic, politically messy world where contrasting viewpoints interact and produce something not something ever lasting, but something which is fragile and must always be fought for, this fight being a necessary feature for a functioning democracy.
Or any good resource which discusses possible optimizations in the infra stack at a more theoretical, abstract, generalizable level?
Strangely, just the other day I met someone in Cambridge (UK) who is moving forward with a startup solving this EXACT problem.
Let me know if you want me to connect.
There are many countries which are open to diversity - India would probably lead that list historically followed by modern Canada. But none is close to USA. On the other hand, Japan, South Korea, China and Asian tigers have done well without being open and diverse.