nbar1

I feel for the people at Tor who were let go. My company was in the same position and I was unfortunately on the list of people who had their position terminated. While I am upset that I am now unemployed I also can understand how a company can be put in a difficult position during this time. I will survive, and I hope they do too.

I use Amazon Smile to donate to Tor. It's not much, but it's something.

I wouldn't give this website my information.

To check for outstanding warrants.

I would quite like to know when a PR is in movement that I'm involved in.

Practices like this are ridiculous. Of course you should be respectful in a code review, but you should also be to the point and ask questions if you don't understand why they did something they did, even if there is a "better" way you know of. That's how people learn.

The examples they give are just bad.

The below information is incorrect. Chrome HD Themes has the most extensions, not most downloads

Original comment: That "developer" is Chrome HD Themes and the extensions are themes.

Is GitHub not indexed by Google anyway? I'm probably out of the loop on something here.

The content on those domains is highly relevant and appears to be thorough. What do you think a non-profit could have used them for that would be better?

Second one I got was an Indian man.

It was never dropped, it is still in Google's Code of Conduct. It's not, however, included in Alphabets.

https://abc.xyz/investor/other/google-code-of-conduct/

This is just how business works at that level.

Don't like it? Me either, but Google is still playing by the rules.

I feel like at this point, anyone using Facebook still is using it because of their addiction or for business purposes.

Only the Google Chromebooks are priced high, and still isn't even close to the Macbook.

There are many offerings from other company for just a few hundred dollars that run Chrome OS.

Not really. People could be in debt, people could be taking care of their parents or other family members. You are making a lot of assumptions because you think everyone who works at Google is rich.

Not everyone is in a position to walk away from a job in hopes to land a new one in a week. People have families, bills, obligations.

Yes, you can advertise to only one sex. The problem is they advertised a job ad.

Unfortunately, until Apple gets onboard we aren't willing to take advantage of them at my job.

>The review concluded there was "overwhelming evidence" they were far safer than smoking and "of negligible risk to bystanders"

The only marketing I've seen for it was the tape on my packages the last few weeks.

I don't see this as an issue. Google does it with all of their products.

If you own a flooring company and a cabinet company, you're going to try to convince your flooring customers to buy your cabinets.

If you read the comment you replied to, he states they are vulnerable to one of the big 5 competing against them and wiping out their business model. This isn't hard to classify at all, it's a matter of fact.

People who don't go early and wait around.

We've come full circle. Except this circle has adware.

I like what the guy did, but am I the only one who feels most of these "I did x with y" articles always end up trying to sell you something? What happened to just sharing our knowledge with each other?

The point is certainly valid. If Google steps out of this, they are just going to find someone to fill those shoes.

I think people might be missing a use case... It will map your exact body type and then allow you to try on clothes with AR through your phone screen.

Yeah... "promised"

Consider the trend we're seeing where a company is acquired and ultimately shut down. Those "promises" are (likely) no longer even the founders decision. What happens then?

Edit: it may also be a good idea to disclose that you're the founder/CEO of a Bubble partner.