To me, it sounds like just another word.
799 karma · joined November 21, 2016
To me, it sounds like just another word.
Not within a capitalist system, no. There are other systems though.
> If a story has not had significant attention in the last year or so, a small number of reposts is ok. Otherwise we bury reposts as duplicates.
Input markdown, get a web page.
In what way? It might change the cultural landscape but that happens all the time, even the most nationalistic state does not have the exact same culture it did 100 years ago. Old culture will go away to make place for a new one, or rather, culture is always evolving.
> You can forget about that for a while and play the game of the inevitable failure of multiculturalism, but it will always fail, you will always destroy society, and from the ashes, a cohesive, homogeneous people will reemerge to build back from the ashes of your stupidity as has always been done
Do you have any examples?
Counting the listeners in a station instead of visitors site-wide would be kinda neat though, and "room" works well then I think.
edit: or maybe "in the cafe" for site-wide visitors? That should be clear and has the same feeling as "room".
I'm in a very secular country. Non-religious people are... non-religious. I don't believe there is anything that "replaces" religion in most people's lives. If you're not religious, you don't necessarily have metaphysical needs, and I think most people here don't.
Regarding religious people: they meet with eachother in church and other constellations as usual. Nothing is keeping people from practicing their religion, but they can't assume most people will empathize with their views, which is true for many different standpoints in life, not just religion.
(I did not read the article as I was paywalled, I might have missed the context of your comment)
This is something we as a society need to deal with, and not disregard a systematic problem with anecdotal success stories and saying "You can too!"
I don't have a good answer to this. I would therefore suggest decreasing the duration of copyright to somewhere around 5-10 years to give the copyright holder time to sell the work with exclusive rights, after which the work enters public domain (like copyright was initially intended to work).