146 karma · joined November 30, 2016
The issues you enumerated were very well addressed in the socialist USSR.
There will always be people like you, who will accept every single shit, then call them “gift from builders”.
EDIT: You edited your comment after I submit my response. You cannot put arbitrary abbreviations and expect people to read your mind. Anyway, there is no point in arguing with you.
Not only you didn’t get the point, but you still hold on to your delusions:
> life for our kin will only be better.
Right? In this subscription economy? Where you have just limited time to watch the movie you loved? You can’t afford to rent the house you loved let alone buy it? (previous generations could afford) the list goes on and on.
Maybe stop spreading lies and see things more objectively?
I don't know who's "we" for the author, but I DO want physical media. I want to have the feeling when I reach to my video game disc, take it out and put it into my console. Besides DRM-free digital purchase doesn't guarantee that the thing you bought won't disappear - digital game store can you bankrupt, video game publisher might legally force its title to be removed, etc., the list goes on and on.
If the primary purpose of code review is to assess maintainability, there is no need for review, that can be done by automated tooling (formatting, bad naming, cyclomatic complexity etc.)
a. Spreading lies
b. Exaggerating your experience
Now, Will they last forever? Of course not, but they are mine!
In other words, we have to protect our billions of cash from burning.
They could keep the prices down, but then again for these C-suites everything should go up, right? Who cares if the market is “ready” for price jumps? Who cares when HDD, memory manufactures prioritize Sam Atmans? Heck, half-made, buggy games now starts at $80 price point.
It’s unfortunately billionaires’ world.
Great for what? Centralizing the internet? making it impossible to exercise your rights to delete your account? Not making alternative plans when one line of change breaks many services?
Removal of skeuomorphism, removal of essential ports, making MacBooks so thin that they wouldn’t work without overheating to name a few.
I am so glad he is gone now, it’s not all bells and whistles for Apple now, but at least it’s way more pleasing to own Apple devices any more.
AI agents do that, perhaps not always, but still do. Now the question: would I trust AI without verifying its output?
However, I couldn’t care less about faster CPU when:
1. It limits my ability to upgrade my system
2. Windows gets increasingly bloated and slower
I was recently talking to an HR person from a European company, and she goes: 'We are forcing our developers to use AI coding agents, but they are still kind of hesitant.' This person had never written a single line of code, nor did she know what software engineering is. For these people, using AI coding agents = faster delivery without breaking anything.
Open source software maintenance without qualifications? I hope you understand how disastrous it would be for serious software like rsync.
Wrong, a profession is an occupation that requires specialized training or qualifications. This means one can have a profession and still not get paid.
> And he mainly seems to be getting abuse in return for that service.
What abuse you are referring to?
Just because one offers software for free doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be standards.
The main problem with using AI in open source software is that millions of people rely on your code, but you risk exposing them all to something unverified.
You are literally one missing tab away from breaking your entire configuration file. Yet the industry keeps pushing it for the sake of “simplicity” - for small configurations sure, it’s fine, but many hundred lines of config entries? Good luck fixing it, if something goes wrong.
I still can’t get why software engineers suddenly started to hate XML.