134 karma · joined June 9, 2013
Up to now, most scientists have been too occupied with the development of new theories that describe what the universe is to ask the question why. On the other hand, the people whose business it is to ask why, the philosophers, have not been able to keep up with the advance of scientific theories. In the eighteenth century, philosophers considered the whole of human knowledge, including science, to be their field and discussed questions such as: did the universe have a beginning? However, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, science became too technical and mathematical for the philosophers, or anyone else except a few specialists. Philosophers reduced the scope of their inquiries so much that Wittgenstein, the most famous philosopher of this century, said, “The sole remaining task for philosophy is the analysis of language.” What a comedown from the great tradition of philosophy from Aristotle to Kant!
However, if we do discover a complete theory, it should in time be understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few scientists. Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists, and just ordinary people, be able to take part in the discussion of the question of why it is that we and the universe exist. If we find the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason – for then we would know the mind of God.
-- Stephen Hawking
LPT for those that enjoy going insane by reading things at super speed: http://spritzinc.com/get-spritz . [no affiliation]
Besides that, just have my own forked merge of exolymph's and m4tthumphrey's replies.
As in another discussion, it's just part of life.. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16338723 . If it wasn't HN, it would be slashdot, or ars, or medium, or searching deep into the web for ghost hosts.
edit: I know about hardware and software, but since we are all wetware, maybe we should think about it as its own class and/or function?
Should be fixed up with GTK+ 4.0. That said, I also love the extensions on Gnome 3 and have been using it as my daily driver for a while now. Every once in a while I get the kick to try something else, see how unity is, check out KDE, enjoy Awesomewm for a bit, but I keep finding myself back with Gnome.
Protip: if you like dark themes, install "Stylish" for Firefox and search for "dark" and install them all. In addition to the desktop UI theme, most of the web can be painted with a pleasing light on dark grey style, and I have no complaints.
Using a gram matrix across several layers to hold the style, and more conventional activation optimization for the content. Trained on VGG. It combines the two loss functions of style and content to optimise noise towards a output image. The amazing thing is being able to mathematically separate content from style; in a similar fashion to how the brain can perform this task. See: https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06576
Fwiw, I'm part of a group trying a similar thing on very deep residual net's with recurrent net's to improve upon the temporal sweeps.
Also: http://samrowe.com/wordpress/advancing-in-the-bash-shell/ blew my mind.
really?