I wonder if the technology landscape will shift in sich a fast way that the people earning the most are the best learners. To some degree, this is already the case. But that also means that you'll earn less when you become older and are not that good in learning anymore.
What kind of leaderbordses? Ratio character/upvotes? Leaderbord of flagged persons. Leaderbord of long discussions -> i.e. people responding in the same thread. Leaderbord of most flagged comments and people w/ most flagged. Leaderbord on people who use the word karma often.
I am not a scientist in this field and can not evaluate the quality of his studies. But if you let ChatGPT do the "non-scientific" work, this seems to be okay to me. Also, I think that with the time there will be better mechanisms for evaluating studies/scientists as generating spam will be easier. But nonetheless, I think these rankings don't fulfill a scientific need. A scientific discovery can be important, but that doesn't mean anyone recognizes that.
I love this film. In the beginning, you are enerved and thinking that it‘s really boring. But in the end, the feeling is fascinating. I like the long sequences and how the tension is built up. Great film.
Funny, you recognize sometimes that they took tracks from Youtube: https://classical.music.apple.com/de/album/1553740049
Here, look at "J.S. Bach: Cellosuite Nr. 1 in G-Dur, BWV1007: I. Prelude (Transc. for Guitar), which is recorded by Ana Vidovic. At 1:28, she is making a small error, which she is also making at this YT video at 1:40: https://youtu.be/zBdK-ailioA
I think the main question is: Why does Trump get indicted and Bush does not? The answer could be: Bush did a crime that supported some of the elite's supposed interests, while Trump demystified the president's role, which is clearly against the interests of "the elite", if you want to call it like that. In my opinion, war crimes are far worse than not declaring hush money correctly, but everybody has their own priorities.
I think this attitude is wrong. A strong democracy doesn't need to fight "fake news" legally and doesn't need their own propaganda op in foreign states like Radio Free Asia etc. If you are banning foreign media in your own country, you are doing the same as China in the end. Why not establish a great firewall?
I know an artist who has a bandcamp profile, but doesn't make a lot of money over it. It's mostly a business card for getting booked. But that might apply to Spotify for not very well known artists, too.
That's right. But what I really like at Spotify is that I can start a track on my iPhone, which is connected to my music box, and then add tracks to the waiting list or change them from my iPad. I really miss this option in Apple Music.
I am a student with not a lot of money and I really love classical music. I don't have to pay for Spotify due to Spotify family. Also, I really don't like the cliché that classical music is mostly for the well-earning élite. Classical music is just great music. Totally agree with you. Like the idea of a seperate app; when I am streaming my favorite music on Spotify, it's sometimes weird to listen to some piece of contemporary music and then a classical piece.