I don't know of UI slips, but that'd be incompetente, yes.
43 karma · joined November 11, 2014
I don't know of UI slips, but that'd be incompetente, yes.
PoS have been around for 3 (maybe 4?) years by now.
Proof of Stake is quite genius in the politics of it, and the power needed to run is minimal (you still need to keep your hardware powered on)
People form other countries just can't get it right :)
I should have probably gone for something more "traditional" like Express (to learn proper node), but I have to say that coming from Java/Spring, I felt quite at home with it. Also, learnt a lot about callback hell.
Nice to see they went on with the project and built some stuff on it. Open source looks like the way to go for them, which is a good thing for everyone.
Closed source. It's a choice.
To be fair, some (most?) of the advances wouldn't have been possible without economic competition between manufactors, but closed source/closed design/closed production is bound to produce result like these. So, i don't know... Tradeoffs?
What's conventional about social media? Someone with the least love of self should seriously stay away from that.
I also have bookmarks at the root level for things that I will Definitely See Tomorrow™, which I never erase, because hey, They could be important.
Since it's the weekend, have this extremely educational video about languages https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
If it only had a CLI so that I could use it directly from my terminal...
When you start an application, one of the two cards will handle that application.
I generally can't my browser with the high power card; probably because browser vendors don't want to sacrifice battery life all of the time for some fancy effects a small slice of the time.
But I'm no expert. Chrome seems to handle things better than Firefox, that's why I still have it.
It might just as well don't care about being shot at.
Puns aside, Who on earth would make a blind person work on UI? I think it's better that you parted with them, even tho I'm sorry you have trouble finding a good job.
Best of luck.
Yeah, I know, I'm not good enough, I didn't study enough, I'm not enlightened enough. But why make things so overly comples in the first place?
I find them much better than walls of text.
All the caps everywhere are for modern switches.
I just don't dig the obsession with "aesthetics". It just doesn't compute. I understand the need for simplicity, but there's JUST NO PLACE for aesthetics in science. We need simple verifiable experiments and results, no "my model is more beautiful than yours" stupidity.
One important thing: scientists need to recognize where science ends and passion/preference begins. Scientism is the greatest foe of science.
Disclaimer: I'm not a scientist.
I mean, I know it's a term, but the literal meaning... If they had been diligent where/when diligence was due, all of this was evitable.
Also, they should really do some legal action on the guy. Not because of revenge, but to try to save others from future actions of the con man. Public shaming is just not so stylish.