498 karma · joined February 27, 2009
...thus eliminating all the tedious chatting, relaxing and making friends that people were previously forced to do while waiting for elevators.
I mean, it's a sleazy practice, especially considering how they word their emails, but I wouldn't expect something for nothing just because I hadn't set up a billing mechanism yet.
It's not, but the Linux weenies won't hear of it. Maybe it's a great choice on Linux, but on Windows, it often renders things much worse than stock WMP (both legacy and modern). Videos with a lot of motion play especially poorly.
But, yeah, it opens everything.
Settings -> Accessibility -> Visual effects -> Always show scrollbars
No such luck for title bars, though, or the general Fisher-Price-ification of Windows overall.
| Nonsense. The most widely-deployed software with the lowest bug-count is written in C. Type systems could not have done anything to improve that.
C is statically and fairly strongly typed. Hard to tell if you're arguing for or against the statement you're responding to.
"In Upper Manhattan, downtown 1 skips 137 St-City College, 125 St, 116 St-Columbia University, Cathedral Pkwy (110 St) and 103 St
Aug 1 - 4, Fri 9:45 PM to Mon 5:00 AM
For service to these stations, take the 1 to 96 St and transfer to an uptown 1.For service from these stations, take the 1 to 168 St and transfer to a downtown 1." [1]
There are often many simultaneous service changes.
Secure Connection Failed
An error occurred during a connection to reverse-pacman.staticrun.app. PR_END_OF_FILE_ERROR
-A Fish Called Wanda
These days, some vague tattoos will do it.
Uploaded video dialog:
Bowman: You know, of course, though, he's right about the 9000 series having a perfect operational record. They do.
Poole: Unfortunately that sounds a little like famous last words.
Bowman: Yeah, still it was his idea to carry out the failure mode analysis, wasn't it?
Poole: mmm
Bowman: Should certainly indicate... (away from camera): his integrity and self-confidence
Bowman: If he were wrong, it'd be the surest way of proving it.
Poole: It would be if he knew he was wrong.
Results:
"Of course there is recommended getting necessary to have a perfect operational rank i know youre going to be the first to do that youre going to get the best youre going to get the best youre going to get the best youre going to get the best youre going to get the best of yours if you want to rock better sure its well perfect."
A less rigorous explanation, but probably more to the author's point, is that people who end up filling the wrong niche add more negativity to the world than those who find their place. This is a worse state of affairs than leaving some niches unfilled.
What I don't understand is the emphasis on the robustness of tech such as floppies. I remember them being quite fiddly and easily corrupted. Is it just a way to justify dragging their feet on modernizing? Security by obscurity? Something else?
Is this the same community that champions human-centered design and architecture, a la Christopher Alexander, Jane Jacobs, etc.?