mosdl

Wouldn't the issue be that an interview center could take money to lie/etc? When I start a job I would have to go through I-9 verification - if that process is not good enough to weed out fakes, how would another verification work better?

And first mover usually requires a lot of money to secure (ads, etc) so basically the person who gets the most vc or is already rich will win.

Once the person makes their 100m company, 10 competitors will undercut them by using AI to duplicate the work.

It was livescript originally.

The name, it was originally going to be called Livescript.

Quite common, lots of old software that is custom written lives on, be it java apps, old vb stuff, etc

I miss mozilla's XUL language (and XBL!), those were awesome.

There is a big difference between the public able to read the books vs using them build a commercial product. Especially if that product will be used to generate commercial work that competes with your work.

Take out the sim and say the phone has no internet connection

Bridge in earthquake zone vs an intersection is a great comparison!

As in everything, there are good recruiters and bad ones. I know several good ones who've gotten me good interviews - perhaps ask anyone on your team if they know any and consider using them.

A great quote and applies to a lot of things

Seems to be taking how old frameworks used to work in the old days (download some html/js and run in an closure) and wraps it into webcomponents. Neat, but not sure why its a paper.

From what I heared (I had some popular webos apps) the touchpad hardware was forced by HP onto the webos team.

It was a great tool for losing changes!

Android is a different beast since OEMs highly customize the UX. Samsung could easily make a horrible liquid glass ripoff and stick it on Android without Google doing anything.

Most of Google's work on Android seems to be around making smaller changes for the UX and bigger internal changes (splitting up the OS so individual parts can be updated without the OEM involvement, security changes, etc).

Seems overly distracting, and not a lot of contrast.

They only care about rights when it helps them.

Its funny that OpenAI is complaining, they don't mind saying copyright doesn't apply to them if it makes them money.

Happened in north carolina, but the incident is still being investigated according to the relative who is still in the hospital (luckily only major bruising, nothing broken, subarus are really good at rolling safety it turns out).

Depending on where you live there are laws around vacation time. Or perhaps ask for a raise/promotion.

Wife has a relative who was just (this weekend) in a major accident where a tesla ran into them and pushed their a ditch where it rolled a few times. Initial report says the Tesla was in self drive mode. Will be interesting to see who was at fault here but so far it is not looking good for Tesla.

That's OpenAI's issue, not the court.

The problem is they vote for the worst type of legislators

We had a Microcenter that closed in 2012, took them that long to return.

Here in sv there are quite a lot of them...

The LLMs already have trouble with basic react features like hooks, so that bodes poorly.

I haven't seen code quality improve much over the past year, in fact some things like react hooks I've seen them get worse at.

AI just stole all its content, I wonder if they will choose to sue.

Start an AI startup that uses your camera to check if you have them on and raise $20 million.