moi2388

Because they can’t. They can’t get the coalition even though they tried, and the straight is too narrow to be able to actually ensure safe passage.

> Either you evolve to analyse other people or the world around, not both.

What makes you think people can’t do both?

Kids going to the library is modern life? Sure.

You don’t need to control them 24/7. Some however you need to restrict more than others.

That means no personal device and talking to the school about what they do with the device there. There are teachers present and the kid can hand it in during break time.

> I say this again and again in various places - something wise needs to be done about children and the internet.

There already is. It’s called parenting.

If your child cannot handle the internet, do not give him access to it.

If your child can only handle supervised internet, only allow it from the home pc.

If your kid, like quite some children, is perfectly capable of navigating the internet and talking about worrisome content they encounter, give them a personal device.

This sounds like the parents who are shocked that their kid does criminal stuff, but let him or her be on the streets till midnight without any supervision.

And if you mean “people who can live off of tournament winnings” it’s not more than 26.

It’s like most of art, writing, and sports. The only way to make money is by becoming a teacher.

I don’t mind duplication at all. I mind undiscoverable duplication.

But if I have an interface and three subclasses with duplicated or almost duplicated code, this is quite easy to find.

That’s much nicer than an abstract base class where only some children override the methods, because now I need to check which ones actually do.

I’m sorry, what is that personal robot going to do for me? Do the laundry for which I already have a machine? Dry my clothes for which I already have a machine? Vacuum clean for which I already have a robot? Cook for which I already have an oven? Do the dishes for which I already have a machine?

Up to 4% of turnover. So if they make more than that it is still profitable to keep going.

Not that it is likely that they make that much in profit, but still. There probably shouldn’t be a limit, and there probably should be personal legal consequences such as jail time for repeat offenders.

I’m not sure I understand. Does this say that you ask Fable to review code with vulnerabilities and implement fixes, then Fable runs the code to verify thereby running the exploits?

If so, that’s expected, isn’t it? Is that not exactly what it’s for?

Of course it is. But stocks aren’t a measure of current profitability. It’s a bet on future profits.

How many serious, large AI players are there? Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, and who else exactly?

At least one of them will probably win. And winning here means billing almost all companies for AI and automation, consumers, perhaps robotics and research.. and that potential earning is massive.

So yes, I will pay 10 times the worth for the stock now, but paying 1000 per stock for a chance of owning all that future profit is not that outrageous.

The hallmark symptom of these mushrooms are Lilliputian hallucinations. This is a clinically defined psychiatric condition characterized by the perception of numerous tiny human, animal, or fantasy-like figures in one’s environment. They’re often very realistic, three dimensional figures said to be colorfully dressed, very mobile, and interacting with the physical world—like climbing up chairs or tables, or clinging to surfaces.

Product owners are the worst thing to happen to products since sliced bread.

It does?

“ Patients describe colourful figures only a few centimetres tall, marching, dancing and climbing over the furniture.”

Oh that sounds much less fun.

So a mixer and an oven? Or does that not count because it’s 2 buttons to bake something?

Fortunately npm was a shitshow long before ai

LLMs are deterministic, they are only non-deterministic when you add a temperature.

I’m sorry, but this entire article is written by AI and I’m just so done with this.

Well, what if it’s not a single cause, but a combination of

- older parents

- higher bmi

- processed food

- pesticides

- less exercise

- more stress

- hpv

- air quality

- pfas

- lack of sleep

Oh you import food from third world countries and it’s terrible? Who would have guessed.

Better keep pushing the farmers in the EU away for more of these great “trade deals”

Why is the first beer the most critical choice?

Why isn’t the last beer the most critical one, for example?

It often is. Above a certain value you need EU wide bidding.

Post and trains already had to be privatised since them being government owned was deemed anti competitive by EU standards

Yes. Now it’s through a judicial army based on criminalising speech, and instead of based on a country, based on a religion.

Because that’s so much better

It is, merely saying what he meant

Folic acid, vitamin D, iron, calcium, iodine, omega-3

Unbridled immigration doesn’t work, and that’s become pretty clear.

You need limits, and integration, assimilation would be even better.

A rate below 0.99… so less than 1 kid per 2 adults

What is consciousness, McGlockenshire?

Really Chiang?

Alright. What is consciousness? Please provide a definition that somehow encompasses all humans and excludes all current AI.

I’ll wait.

Unless your field of academia is digital. Perhaps this is why he wanted to attack printers on the network.