moeedm

Cheese, aka milk, is the leading cause of obesity in the world.

That’s the business of stock photos. Unsplash managed to stick around because they provided free high quality images that were more “real” looking than stock photos. It was supported by ads, which I’m sure kept the site running but when Getty knocks on your door and offers to buy you out ... it’s hard to say no.

The cycle will continue. In its place there will be a new Unsplash which will offer the same + a bit more until it gets bought out too.

Yes, it’s possible but you can’t say the same about live feed. Cows will be cows, pigs will be pigs.

> Renewable energy has entered the chat

Supply chains and process can be streamlined. A herd of cows is a herd of cows.

Pray tell what "healthy relationship" we have with nature with the current status quo?

Using science and technology for good by reimagining the antiquated methods of creating stuff like milk, cheese, beef , honey, leather, etc is a good thing.

I'm vegan, btw.

Walmart. Thats how.

Material Design is the new Bootstrap.

They're not forced to, they're tempted to. And most people will. From the presentation, it looks like as soon as you take a photo it's uploaded and backed up on Google's servers.

Well I choose what to put on the "public web". Unlimited photo storage means all your photos.

I don't want Google's servers looking over my images and analyzing them. No thank you.

I wouldn't say they are dead. The decline of the sales for iPad can be attributed to its wildly successful launch. People just hang on to their iPads a lot longer than they do their iPhones. The numbers should stabilize soon.

I don't have to say much, just go and read the manifesto for Material Design. It's a lot of words that don't mean anything [1].

Another problem with it is that it's extremely trendy. Bright, almost fluorescent colors, ridiculous amounts of whitespace almost to a fault, long shadows, arbitrary grids for icons, etc.

The bigger problem is that Google decided to become smartasses about creating a new design language. They took it way too seriously and I think who this hurts the most is the developers who make apps for Android. They don't know what Material Design means -- really means, as in how Google sees it. Third party developers will never really be able to adapt it properly and what you're going to end up with is a whole new type of visual fragmentation in Android.

This look already looks dated, and I can't imagine what it will look like in a year.

[1] http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introducti...

Really hope this Material Design nonsense doesn't take off. It's awful (especially on the web).

Stop thinking of the Apple Watch as a technology product. It's not called iWatch for a reason. It's called Apple Watch and if you think you're going to take it to the Genius Bar to get it looked at, you're dead wrong.

For starters, it's not called "iWatch".

10 years from now Apple won't be a tech company, they will be an international luxury brand that creates products in many different areas. This is just the first step.

Jony Ive was pretty clear about why they didn't go for a round face in his interview with The New Yorker:

> Ive later tested watchbands by wearing them outside the studio with other watches. The shape of the body, meanwhile, barely changed: a rectangle with rounded corners. “When a huge part of the function is lists”—of names, or appointments—“a circle doesn’t make any sense,” Ive said.

You would take your watch to Apple and get it serviced. They'd buff it up, and swap out the S1 for an S2 and so on.

Safari is the best browser on OSX hands down.

What are you going on about? Apple and Netflix offer a service, not a protocol that should be used by everyone. They decide which platform to support — this isn't about any protocol.

Netflix and Apple don't have to open up anything if they don't want to. It's their service and ultimately they can choose which platforms to support. This is just whining from BlackBerry.

Hey Blackberry, how about you just make a product that doesn't suck?

Food is so much more appealing when it has a version number, right?

Unfortunate domain name.

Spot on.

A lot of people have recommended a Kindle to me but I've held off. I can't get past the massive Amazon logo on it and the awful page turn.

That website sucks.

A phone with 3 SIM card slots? You don't get Apple, do you?

"Apple enforces terms of agreement" isn't as bait-y is it?

This is getting fucking ridiculous.