mmarian

> you want a high fidelity test of a specific cloud dependency

Reached the same conclusion. Plus it's a fair amount of effort to set them up and maintain.

Editorialised, I know. But much clearer what it's about vs original title "OpenBB belongs to everyone".

Side note - I'll be giving a talk about my AI extension on Thu @ 3 pm!

My suspicion is that it's by design, to fight scrapers and extensions like this one.

Most people genuinely want that, even if they say they don't. It's the only reason I can think of why low-value posts get so many likes.

Built one 6 years ago that I gave up on https://github.com/mihailthebuilder/simplyfeed. The problem was that so many posts were filtered out that the feed would just show up empty.

Good to know it's not just me! I also found it's way too verbose. So much so that I added an entry in my Claude.md telling it to be concise.

IQ levels are same as before, it's just easier to spot differences.

Not mine. Translated title of repo.

That's crazy. A dev meetup in Northampton UK has backlog for 10 months of talks. Although it is generalist.

I find it ok once you heavily filter the content. But you need to put in a lot of effort.

the most serious candidate in the election

Same here. I feel it's what every software owner thinks, but no one is willing to admit because of the backlash.

Various concepts when I joined new teams in domains I've never worked in before. And system design. So very practical, and where stakes were high.

Conflicted about this study. On one hand, LLMs have been incredible for my personal learnings of new concepts.

On the other, I'm sceptical of that it'll have "strong benefits" at scale; I'd be more in favor if the wording was "some"/"moderate". I reckon self-selection plays a huge part, as mentioned in the "Limitations" section of the paper.

I'd also caution against attaching the tool to grading. That means students have to put more effort into the course, which increases the chances that they will use LLMs to save time rather than make the investment.

> In the 2025/26 DFB-Pokal semi-finals, Bayer 04 Leverkusen hosted FC Bayern Munich at home. The match was officiated by a team of referees led by Felix Zwayer. During the game, he wore a camera on his headset—the so-called RefCam!

Sharing it as I didn't know about this RefCam. I don't watch football but found it quite interesting.

Try YC's co-founder matching platform. Start broad, then apply filters.

Agree job-wise somewhat. With the caveat that you're discounting that you're good at IT, which is why you find it easier; your classmates wouldn't.

On entrepreneurship - the low execution cost and huge capital inflows in software startups actually makes it very hard to succeed in that space because it leads to intense competition. The success stories are the tip of the iceberg.

This makes hardware startups relatively easier to build, believe it or not.

Full statement behind title is interesting. I actually agree with the founders - it's easier to make good money acquiring a proven business and improving its financials, than it is starting something and trying to prove to customers it'll work.

You need have the capital from the get go though.

Used to in the past. Now use it as an opportunity to look out the window, or write something in my diary. Significantly improved my mental health.

If you said ~/. I would've thought you want to poison the LLM fountain

Claude censored from performing certain tasks due to US embargoes. Capitalism with Chinese characteristics.

I found NotebookLM podcast voices better than ElevenReader's, so maybe check out Google's services? Just tried OpenAI's voice in ChatGPT, sounds more natural than 11labs as well.

Even the customer does QA.