966 karma · joined August 19, 2020
In a similar fashion Vincent Ford, who was the Air Force colonel responsible for von Neumann when he was in hospital dying of cancer, published a manuscript, Twenty-Four Minutes To Checkmate, on the US crash program for ICBMs focusing on the 1953-1957 period, which obviously overlaps a lot with when von Neumann was involved in those topics. It's held in the Dwight Eisenhower Library in Kansas however it's also only available if you visit in person.
It would be a great boost to the history of science if both texts were either published or scanned and uploaded online to make them significantly more accessible to both scholars and interested laypersons.
That is one of the exact purposes those agencies exist for in almost every country of the world.
> possibly misleading the public about casualty numbers
The numbers given in the documents are consistent with the numbers publicly stated by the US military.
> demanding an investigation
For what? I don't see how he is a whistleblower when he hasn't exposed any illegal activity. It's pretty clear from what he friends said that he was doing this solely to impress his friends, which is pretty clearly illegal.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/us-military-inspectors-...
https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/zruc58/221209835_a_no...
For an interesting perspective the physicist Murray Gell-Mann spoke on similar issues in a 1997 interview:
https://web.math.princeton.edu/generals/tao_terence
https://www.ams.org/journals/notices/202007/rnoti-p1007.pdf (less technical)
I wonder if this is related.
https://www.crn.com/news/security/zscaler-ceo-major-eu-inter...
Title: Zscaler CEO: ‘Major’ EU Internet Cable Cut Was ‘Act Of Vandalism’
Most incidents of cuts in internet cables usually have benign causes but given recent hostilities it's worth keeping an eye on whether these incidents start becoming far more common than they have been historically.
Not quite so simple, see: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/126512/why-doesn...
In general especially as once gets into more advanced mathematics the abstraction level gets much higher quite quickly so it would interesting to know if there is any connection between brain structures and ability to grasp abstract mathematics. As an example I know a physicist who can tell you everything about general relativity and has a solid grasp of differential geometry but one time I was trying to teach him some mathematical logic and he just couldn't grok it no matter how many hours we spent on it. Likewise subjects that use category theory heavily (homological algebra/algebraic geometry for example) are known to be difficult to understand even for professional mathematicians in other areas.
[0]: https://bentilly.blogspot.com/2010/08/analysis-vs-algebra-pr...
https://www.pdf-tools.com/en/products/pdf-optimizer/
When I mean optimized I mean maintaining the page quality too. Obviously you can make the PDF look like crap but that's not very useful.
How to deal with duplication is also a very difficult problem because there's loads of reasons why things could be duplicated. Take a textbook, I've seen duplicates which contain either one or several of the following: different editions, different printings (of any particular edition), added bookmarks/table of contents for the file, removed blank white pages, removed front/end cover pages, removed introduction/index/copyright/book information pages, LaTeX'd copies of pre-TeX textbooks, OCR'd, different resolution, other kinds of optimization by software that reduces to wildly different file sizes, different file types (eg .chm, PDFs that are straight conversions from epub/mobi), etc. Some of this can be detected by machines, eg usage of OCR but some of the other things aren't easy at all to detect.
If you've studied real analysis some of the integrals don't converge the way the paper claims they do (I think Lubos makes similar comments on the page you linked in one of the sister comments).