And while you very well could make the translation from whatever the original was to "It will rain tomorrow," it might not be a literal one that preserves the original tenses, which would obscure exactly what he was trying to point out.
120 karma · joined February 28, 2011
And while you very well could make the translation from whatever the original was to "It will rain tomorrow," it might not be a literal one that preserves the original tenses, which would obscure exactly what he was trying to point out.
One caveat, however. I recently switch to OS X and have yet to figure out how to get alt/option to behave this way. Really my only major gripe about OS X vs. linux.
Because javascript lacks this and many other features of Scheme/Lisp, I wouldn't really recommend using it for SICP.
[1] Tail recursive functions are recursive functions which merely return the result of their recursive call to the caller instead of further processing those results before returning. In pseudocode:
// non-tail
expt(b, x):
if x == 0: 1
else: x * expt(b, x-1)
// tail-recursive
tail-expt(b, x, ans):
if x == 0: ans
else: tail-expt(b, x-1, x*ans)
For these definitions: expt(2, 3) == tail-expt(2, 3, 1)I definitely agree there. Just the other day, one of my mother's kindergarten students was drawing pictures of her and her teaching assistant and decided to caption the assistant's with "she helps us with our work" and my mother's with "she tests us."
[1] Clickable: http://news.ycombinator.com/ask
2007 did do fairly poorly from what I remember as well. 2010 though is much better; I go back and forth between those fairly regularly. Fonts are obviously an issue, and complex formatting isn't quite right all of the time, but each suite seems to open most of the other's file types fairly well.
Using vim (or sed for whole directories of files) you can do the same thing using a search and replace regex.
in vim:
:%s/<find>/<replace>/gcNo. Rather, I have no information that I trust to convince me one way or the other as to their honesty, so I choose to ignore that data.
I had not, however, considered that they have already been vetted by PG and YC. Perhaps I have a small reason to trust their claims. Even so, I'd give it the same weight in decision making as known hyperbole, at best. I'll only completely trust the claim if I have verifiable sources.