Out of curiosity - do you just not check personal email at all at work? Or do you use your phone and don't connect to corporate wifi?
603 karma · joined June 8, 2016
half troll, half serious.
if you'd like to reach out, send a note:
misterbowfinger plus hn at gmail dot com
Out of curiosity - do you just not check personal email at all at work? Or do you use your phone and don't connect to corporate wifi?
If MongoDB is AGPL, why does everyone else throw a shit fit? Despite its faults, MongoDB is still massively popular, so I assume it's used at many enterprises.
Also, side note: can anyone point a blog post (preferably from a lawyer) that explains why AGPL is so problematic?
https://medium.com/@iainsproat/freebase-is-dead-long-live-fr...
Is that an impact on LocalStorage?
AmeriSpeak seems to have national representation, so I can only assume it was drawn randomly throughout the nation.
This particular survey featured interviews with 1,058 parents who belong to the panel and have a teen ages 13 to 17, as well as interviews with 743 teens
Link: http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/08/22/teens-and-screen-time-...
I get that surveys are really hard, but.... 743 seems like a ridiculously low number.
Looks like the surveys are through the "NORC AmeriSpeak panel".
Pew links to this about AmeriSpeak:
http://www.norc.org/PDFs/AmeriSpeak%20Technical%20Overview%2...
I don't know.... maybe someone who understands surveying & statistics can validate these numbers & their significance better than me?
Doh Phoenix and Elixir are trying to do all the best to help developers be productive, when you are a technology that promises such a huge scale you need to introduce practices that need to be decoupled => bit slower for developers.
Good example of this how a “model” writes to database. Module (with schema) need to call a changeset, changeset call repository, repository writes to database (example). That’s 3 manual steps where in Rails you have in in one.
Phoenix & Ecto work that way because 1) Elixir is functional, and 2) ActiveRecord mixes a lot of concerns that suck in the longterm.
IMO the real thing holding back Phoenix/Elixir is deployment & operational issues. It's being worked on a lot with Distillery, but from what I understand there's still a lot of kinks to be worked out.
I suspect this is the case with most open source communities that don't have a clear "market leader".
But if it's all open source someone can run with it and solve all the things if they wanted to, right?
I was perhaps a bit naive and continue being so...
It feels as though the issues you listed seem solvable? As in, the work to create a distro & craft a community that solves the above problems is work that can be monetized, possibly in a RedHat-like way. I don't know much about RedHat's customers, but I'm curious what percentage of them use RedHat for desktop GUIs.
It'd for sure be a lot of work, particularly the hardware support since you'd have to convince other vendors that it's in their best interests to play nicely. It really feels like there's huge potential upside here because you'd be able to drive down prices (with open source development) and have contracts on the enterprise support angle.
Right, that's probably closer to what I'm getting at. There's probably always going to be a bunch of options for Linux, but there should (?) be a few main ones for most people. And then anyone who wants to customize can then customize to their liking.
But it'll all be open source, not proprietary
I feel similarly. I'm a big Mac fan, but I'm confused why Linux isn't the obvious alternative. I'm guessing the issues are the following:
1) PCs/Laptops to consumers ship with Windows installed by default, likely a distribution partnership w/ Microsoft
2) Popular games run best on Windows
Problem (1) is difficult because of Microsoft's deep pockets. But it feels like it's possible to attack problem (2).
The gaming industry has huge sway on the market. For example, many serious gamers build their own rigs. If gaming companies introduce an open standard that Windows OS's need to abide by to build games, then.... maybe Linux can benefit as well?
I suspect this hugely benefits gaming companies too, because they would be able to develop on open source technology and not have to test their builds on proprietary technology. Honestly, that workflow sounds miserable AND expensive.
Please do! Do you have a blog or something to follow?
Hm, maybe in the short term, but I think the idea is that this fund will change that in the long term. Take Kobe Bryant's investment in Body Armor - it practically doubled his net worth, which means he has more funds to invest. If this fund is closely guided by a16z, it stands to reason that they'd benefit handsomely as well, thus hopefully funding more black scientists, engineers, and mathematicians.
The fact that current VCs worked in tech before is a red-herring - that hasn't always been the case. Those VCs ostensibly raised money from people who never worked in tech, and possibly knew nothing about "the business world". Have hope. This can definitely change.
Also, realize that raising money from Kevin Durant is materially better than raising money with the same terms from another VC. The marketing mojo is really effective.
In their defense, many programmers can be so spiteful and cynical that basically nothing could've been done to change this "communication error."
It's helpful that Salvatore clarified, but I suspect that there are many who won't care or won't be convinced. The headline is all they needed to trip their "GTFO" line.
Personally, I think the move was fine. There are much worse companies out there.
Maybe it's already this way? I'm really not sure, but I'd appreciate a NetBeans or IntelliJ dev to clarify. It'd be awesome if these changes were done collaboratively.
Right... shouldn't the guards have refused, then? Wouldn't that be the expected "moral" behavior?
But it basically makes 0 sense for customers. "Brand" is the exact opposite of a pure function - there's side effects all over the place. Any bad thing that Facebook or Twitter do greatly overshadows the good. Same goes for any other company or flagship product.
This is challenging, because product branding is often championed internally at any company. So thinking about product as "functions" will likely fall apart quickly outside of any engineering org.