Of course thinking about stuff without always using formal statistics is fine and how people work, but if you trick yourself into thinking that you do use statistics for everything it may become harder to evaluate or second guess your own thinking.
1,049 karma · joined December 2, 2013
Of course thinking about stuff without always using formal statistics is fine and how people work, but if you trick yourself into thinking that you do use statistics for everything it may become harder to evaluate or second guess your own thinking.
#1 if you spam the "add a new source" button you eventually get a JavaScript exception logged to the screen due to an array with a fixed max size of 128 elements overflowing.
#2 this could be graphics card or driver specific (I have an AMD card), but scrolling just right can can break the simulation due the the text boxes; for example by quickly paging up and down, or scrolling all the way to the bottom and then wiggling the scroll position up and down. Once this happens the bad data propagates until the entire thing is filled with noise, solid black, or solid white. If you then scroll up to 3D mode the screen will be filled with a mess of polygons.
This is presumably https://github.com/fengari-lua/fengari/issues/147. You can workaround it by substituting "%.f" for "%.0f" in https://fennel-lang.org/fennel/fennel.lua.
However Chrome won't let me override the contents of this URL for some reason. And the first Firefox response override extension I tried ended up confusing the page. So you can alternatively override the contents https://fennel-lang.org/fengari-web.js as follows:
`"string" == typeof o.response ? a.f = yt(o.response.replace("%.f","%.0f")) : a.f = new Uint8Array(o.response.replace("%.f","%.0f"));`
(Just before `var l = Ee(a);`)
Opened a bug for it: https://github.com/bakpakin/Fennel/issues/485
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes...
Your example paper has omitted non-English characters in the names of anyone who gets cited. Look especially at citation [5], where a lot of the authors have European characters in their names which get omitted.
There is also possibly a missing × or ⋅ in "1.81 10^5" on page 3.
Fixing headers or extra tests would not have prevented this, as there is no indication the headers were broken in the first place, and extra tests could have been compromised (or ignored for release tarball) some other way.
[1] https://git.tukaani.org/?p=xz.git;a=commit;h=328c52da8a2bbb8...
But in the end I spent all my time playing around with bitwise operations, so had no time left to add in multiple threads (so couldn't was slowed down by a factor of 4 or so) timing (so had to cut off the search early to not accidentally go over the limit), or to tweak the score heuristic.
Which meant my program only got second place. Still, I think the teacher enjoyed it, and there were some oohs and aahs when my program output moves basically instantly during the tournament.
Chinese sends it's regards.
But also text interchange is useful even if most people only use a fraction of it most of the time. How else is an English document supposed to quote Chinese characters for instance (this happens all the time on wikipedia pages which share the original name of something next to the translation).
The days before unicode were dark days, nowadays besides the ocassional oddity text pretty much just works without users thinking about it -- thanks to unicode.
'splice" means to join two things as if by weaving them together. If used as "splice into" or "splice in" there is a sense of breaking something apart, inserting something into the gap, and joining it back together.
This all makes a bit more sense if you look up the etymology which was about ropes (despite splicing being about uniting, it's closely related to the word 'split').
Hypothetically say a website has an internal service to index posts for keywords for search, that just so happens to unescape HTML entities during keyword normalization due to a seemingly harmless bug.
Plus a second internal service to identify keyword spam that _doesn't_ do any HTML entity unescaping (because why would you?)
Then you could end up in a situation where a spammer uses HTML entities to avoid spam detection while still showing up in search results. They hope that the user ignores the nonsense text and just clicks their link based on the image (a list of big shopping brands in the middle east) instead.
Here Sivvi, toyou, Namshi, noon, and OUNASS are all brands of shopping websites and you can see their logos in the image.
Clearly this is some sort of keyword spam, though it's hard to tell more than that from your screenshot. It's also not clear why they'd bother to use HTML entities... a bug in the spam code? Or perhaps exploiting some parser differential between different twitter systems? Who can say.
The next sentence:
> Although there are numerous ways to select subsets that would prove the initial position results in a draw, we used algorithm 1 to obtain a small subset.
Algorithm 1:
> We developed an algorithm that requires predictive scores for all positions with 50 empty squares and returns a subset such that if the all positions belonging to that subset are solved, and the all solutions match the predictions, the initial position is consequently solved. It was described as Algorithm 1.
(The algorithm is also printed out)
Chrome and Firefox both support Out-Of-Process Iframes as part of their security setup; though I'm not sure if Firefox has it enabled by default yet. Firefox even drew some lovely pictures about it here: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2021/05/introducing-firefox-new-si...
I've observed Chrome to usually default to windows-1252 (latin1) for UTF-8 documents loaded from the network.
I do agree that latin1 headers shouldn't be _sent_ out though.
Got a (pretty good) apron from William Sonoma but it had the logo sewed on with a huge patch, had to painstakingly unstitch it to get a pretty apron without any branding emblazoned across the front.
Though the whimsical fantasy setting of Spyro the Dragon on Playstation was up there too. And I do agree that the Saturn was missing a killer Sonic game. Sonic 3D Blast was a bit too quirky, not 3D enough, and not exclusive enough to be a system seller.
Also I'm a die-hard Sega super fan so totally biased.
If anything the Dreamcast was competing against the PS2 and Gamecube (despite coming out at an awkward time significantly earlier than the competition)
Also hallutination was probably the wrong word to use for LLMs being incorrect since it might imply they could be correct if they would only just focus on the right input data rather than, say, simply not understanding complex technical concents, but I guess that ship has sailed.
Google CSS houdini
(Holy Hell)