329 karma · joined April 30, 2011
[1]: http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/story/2012-05-30/sal-kha...
The benefit of having the shell launched from within Excel, with no setup needed, disappear when you want to run more complex functions like continual updates. And on top of that IronSpread doesn't support Office 2003.
Every time I have to manually cut the /blog/ out of the location bar I wonder how many users were lost by requiring that little bit of extra effort.
They probably don't mean the laptop "can't dual-boot Windows," but that it requires extra steps in deleting Linux, installing Windows, then installing Linux.
I'm pretty sure it's still the case that when you add a HTML5 app to your home screen (so your users see the icon instead of a bookmark in Safari) all of a sudden it doesn't get run on the Nitro JS engine anymore.
Consumers shouldn't have to upgrade to a business plan, paying for business-class support, a static IP, and other features they don't need. Comcast would probably end up making more money and saving a lot of face if they had a plan with sane limits for people who live on digital media.
It seems more plausible that the recovery form has been gamed. The initial hack was programmed to extract the information in advance and possibly even perform the account recovery if necessary. They know exactly what and how much information is needed for Gmail to accept the recovery, whereas the author had to call his s.o. to fill out all the fields.
Either way, it sounds like the Gmail recovery form should be revised. The author argues recovery is already difficult for the true owner to perform. Google could, while keeping the automated process, make it harder for an algorithm to recover the account than the real owner.