49 karma · joined December 11, 2011
It seems obvious that design decision would lead to more incomplete answers than the more restrictive design.
What is required for a non-intern position is experience in development work, and even that has to be in the same technology and language as the job you’re applying for.
Most companies will quiz you on your experience, and want specific details on what you can do. Some will give you a coding exercise to complete, I’ve seen many that don’t care how you completed it, they want you to intelligently describe your design, strategy and execution. Writing a unit test or two is usually impressive.
In old-school companies and government contracts you might get weeded out for not having a degree. Most startups and smaller companies are looking for experience, not academic success.
Ironically I think this interview with Winston Marshall shows how he dealt with being unfairly judged in a similar way.
I was raised by working parents, we bought used cars, lived in the same house for 20-plus years, went on road trip vacations, ate out at a buffet once a week. We watched tv, but I was mostly confused by the lifestyles we saw there. I’m not saying it was a perfect experience, I hated my parents until I started paying my own way. Suddenly I saw my coworkers were struggling on twice my income. I have lots of problems, but money isn’t one of them.
How does a country ever get back on a positive trajectory after such a catastrophe?
>>> My friend Al, with Tesla Owners of East Bay, invited me to crash with him and his family and he advised me to get a jacket. Mind you, I was in the Louisiana heat and it was 95 degrees with 100% humidity, so I thought he was exaggerating. California is supposed to be warm right? In June?
Edited to protect the innocent!
>>There has been an attempt ongoing for some time to harness the respectability of science and conflate it with an increasingly popular philosophy known as scientism. But scientism and science are different things. The latter is a powerful method of obtaining and applying material facts and information. The latter creates a subjective world view using the pretense that science has the capacity to tell us objectively right from wrong, the ethical from the unethical, best from worst, etc..
I don’t know why I enjoy this kind of word history, especially the speculation on what language a word derived from. Thanks for posting this, it was a fun read for me.
I think we can agree on what we mean by weather, but I’m not certain of that either.
His recent Twitter posts suggest that economic inequality in the US can be achieved through taxing the rich, which while not an original thought, seems sensible.
“There were ages of darkness, and then enlightenment came.”
we often see those who came before us as savages. Didn’t they have triumphs and failures, families and friends that they loved? Did the think of their lives as ‘dark’?
Edit: added buckets
I think the hard part is in measuring the data we collect, we don’t always see how data is related to what we’re trying to achieve. The data doesn’t lie, but if you make a mistake interpreting it, it can seem like the universe is conspiring against you.
The government is slow to act, that's often a good thing to keep it from reacting quickly where some discussion or just delay is the wiser course. I get the impression the IRS has proposals to add these types of identity checks, but the inherent delays in decision-making mean any real change is years away. Does anyone know of a plan for the IRS to improve validation of refund requests?