490 karma · joined February 16, 2011
Just imagine where the web would be today if it wasn't necessary to build it with obsolete, counter-intuitive technologies.
Do you lower the chair so much that the armrests fit under the table or do you just not sit that close to the table?
Personally I consider learning a technology as an investment. And with my investments I prefer them to be low risk. That's why I only choose technologies which are definitely going to last a while. Sometimes it's hard to decide if a particular technology will persist. I usually look for support and endorsement of big players in the industry and sufficient user adoption.
Right now I am contemplating using angular.js. I think it would be low risk to learn since it will probably last a while because of Google's involvement and already wide usage.
Other safe options include Twitter Bootstrap, Node.js, Android and jQuery and ?
I would like to read a blog post about what Hacker News considers to be safe options to learn. Anyone interested in writing one?
But I am not sure the GUI engine would really take THAT long. How long did the Android guys need for their GUI solution?. It would be interesting to know that.
And no, I actually don't know people working on projects like this :)
Why is nobody building a second kind of browser, one which is not based on html and css. A browser which is geared towards app execution and development. A browser which can run apps which can be programmed in a way that is similar to programming Android apps. Where I can for example have a footer without doing some css hacks. DNS and most of our backends could still be reused but the client stuff would have to be written again. Delivering apps and linking between them like the web does is awesome. Building sophisticated apps is not awesome but on Android and iOS it is. Why not take the best of both worlds...now....not in 10 years when some standards might agree on something. Just think about how very important the web is. Everyone is using it. The whole world largely depends on it, but it's increasingly not up to the task. And why do web developers seem to be so satisfied with the state of the technology which drives the web. Oh, you think css is great because you can code a hack for putting a footer on the bottom of the page even when there is no content in the attention area? What? It's so strange.
Why has nobody ever tried to create such a browser?
The biggest problem with icon packs is that they are usually too small. When they are too small one has 2 options. 1. Hire someone to make the ones missing and hope he makes them look like the others 2. Use multiple icon packs and have an inconsistent look in your app. 3. Make them yourself
All 3 options are somewhat bad.
That's just what I hate about them. One pack usually won't suffice for a mobile app.
Still I wish you guys luck. The online store thing seems most interesting to me.
Therefore percentage of people having ADD should be much higher in America than anywhere else.
Those people are responsible for the culture of impulsivness and creativity in the USA, kinda like role models. So migration is responsible for the lack of this kind of entrepeneurial approaches in Europe and responsible for the surplus of the same in the USA.
Simple, he? What do you think about this theory?