1,709 karma · joined January 23, 2009
This article is new in claiming innefectiveness at usefully spending money to help disaster victims. I would love to see a detailed audit.
I personally would like to see the Red Cross's response.
http://blog.kubernetes.io/2015/04/borg-predecessor-to-kubern...
He provided a system that could be used as a valuable service for legal activities. It could also be used for illegal or banned activities in various jurisdictions.
I'm just saying that it's a dangerous precedent to say that anyone creating a communication or transaction platform can be held liable for conspiring with users who use it to commit crimes.
Our war-on-drugs sentencing is quite disproportional, IMHO; imputing societal harms that are unfounded. After all, Mr. Ulbright simply provided a safer way for consenting individuals to enter personal financial transactions.
Silk Road is a drop in the bucket compared to all the transactions arranged over SMS messages and using cash - but we don't hold AT&T and the Federal Reserve responsible for running a criminal enterprise.
===== ULBRICHT, 30, of San Francisco, California, was found guilty of: one count of distributing narcotics, one count of distributing narcotics by means of the Internet, and one count of conspiring to distribute narcotics, each of which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison and a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years; one count of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison and a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years in prison; one of count of conspiring to commit computer hacking, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison; one count of conspiring to traffic in false identity documents, which carries a maximum sentence of 15 years; and one count of conspiring to commit money laundering, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. The maximum sentences are prescribed by Congress and are provided for informational purposes only, as the sentence will be determined by the judge. ULBRICHT is scheduled to be sentenced on May 15, 2015.
[1] http://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2015/ross-ulbricht-the-creator-and-owner-of-the-silk-road-website-found-guilty-in-manhattan-federal-court-on-all-countsUnless these folks wholesale copied your html and CSS source code, I don't think you need be getting upset about it. The "look and feel" cases between Apple and Microsoft settled this issue in the 90's - it's not protectable.
Frankly, I consider the aggressive use of these tactics to be a sign that the company is manipulative and untrustworthy.
If a large number of people want to get from point A to point B, even on foot, an accommodation of normal traffic laws should be made to allow that.
Why the hell are police arresting peaceful protestors?
"As part of our Patent Acquisition Agreement (see section 4.4), sellers will retain a license back to their patent. For you lawyers out there, the license is “irrevocable, nonexclusive, nontransferable, nonassignable (including by operation of law or otherwise), nonsublicensable, worldwide, [and] fully paidup.”
I wish it did! Most infringement of a commercial work seems to incur criminal penalties (though you can recover civil damages as well).
(Just as we should have criminal investigations over US surveillance programs...).