maxwell

I'm sure they'll throw the book at them.

Where's the confusion...?

While everyone has a favorite ES Lint ruleset but few agree on which to use.

I didn't see any left the last time I was in New York.

Seems like all the payphones and newsstands are really gone now, e.g. https://maps.app.goo.gl/2vZUGBxvSgdpcdju6

You can just call it "texture," but it's a fun term d'art.

As with "automatic memory collection" for those grossed out by "garbage collection."

Ask questions that involve trade-offs, be they design or performance related, and explicitly tell candidates that you're benchmarking against ChatGPT and expect something beyond what an LLM would give, i.e. you're looking more for creative/critical thinking than mere correctness.

It sucks.

Commercial kitchens use color coded cutting boards AFAIK.

https://www.webstaurantstore.com/3053/cutting-boards.html?fi...

But why WhatsApp in Western Europe and Viber on the Balkan Peninsula?

The right to roam is enshrined in the State Constitutions of New Hampshire and Vermont, and State law in Maine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_to_roam#United_States

I'm reading Carrie, good book so far, reminds me of high school (in Maine) but more the stories recounted by teachers. It reads basically as historical fiction in the little details (jocks and seamstresses and such), while also seeming sadly in line with some recent events. In the early '70s it seems like it was cool to conform, as King explicitly asserts in the book. In the early '00s it was cool to be different. Now it seems like conformity is (was?) cool again, pretty disturbing. I'd consider making the book required reading if I were a high school English teacher.

I saw the movie in high school in the '00s, very faithful to the novel and the casting was even more amazing reading the book (which is 90% of directing, according to Scorsese (who was introduced to De Niro by De Palma)), and to me surpasses the source material. Hits harder as a linear narrative.

I'm reading a book from 1974 right now. The book I read before that was a 2013 adaptation of a book from 1605. The book I read before that was from 1956.

The book I read before was from 1985: I started it while the author was still alive but he died before I finished it. The book I read before that was from 1998.

Forcing transparency isn't outsourcing anything.

And that has resulted in massive industrial consolidation and lack of innovation in food, drugs, healthcare, consumer products, chemicals, automotive/aerospace/locomotive manufacturing, construction, utilities, energy, payments, finance, accounting, and media outside "tech," where we manage our own dependencies.

Rocket science is one of the few industries that's actually seeing active innovation.

That would seem to result in industry consolidation and declining innovation.

Software isn't made of physical materials anyway, it's speech. How about instead we impose open source requirements to enable public verification of critical systems?

Who maintains the mandated dependencies? Who performs certification?

What prevents regulatory capture?

Transparency and competition seem to work better than certifications and credentials.

Just mandate open source if using public money.

You want some government mandating your dependencies...?

Sounds like Eternal Sunshine is on the verge on scientific possibility.

They're just dippin their toes in!

And the First should only cover religions, forms of speech, printing technologies, venues of public assembly, and petitioning grievances that existed before it was "created"?

Why would we want to incentivize and optimize for busting down doors? Sounds more like the Bill of Rights working as intended here.

Doesn't the Global Privacy Control header/property solve for this?

Funny that the technical reality is the inverse, i.e. media is read-only and storage/playback is now trivial beyond availability, software is executable and requires a degree of active maintenance.

The egg.

But it looks like phylotypic animal body plans may have originated in cell aggregates before the development of the egg:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jez.b.21417

There's a gradient of chickenness.

In practice, the chickens I see along the sides of roads clearly know what roads are. And don't cross them.

Yep, Aristotle was wrong. "Chicken and egg problems" aren't paradoxes, the challenge is to find which is the egg.

Whatever the case federally, States can ban asset forfeiture. Mine became the fourth to do so in 2021:

https://reason.com/2021/07/14/maine-becomes-4th-state-to-rep...

Same with exclusionary zoning. State laws can strike down Euclid. SB 9 in California appears to move in that direction:

https://focus.senate.ca.gov/sb9