2,155 karma · joined January 19, 2012
- Building Candid - Former head of P. Engineering at Atrium
https://maxcantor.com/readme
But, its non-violent crime and property crime numbers are through the roof which makes it feel incredibly unsafe.
Miami, on the other hand, actually has a higher homicide rate than SF but because the streets are clean and property crime is much much lower it feels far safer than SF. Also, to be honest, for people reading hacker news, homicides are an incredibly rare black swan event, unlike property crime which you experience almost daily in SF. So, it makes sense for this crowd to have a place higher utility on low property crime than on low homicides. And I'm not judging, I moved to Miami and couldn't be happier with that decision.
However, as part of an internal power structure, it does start to make sense. For example, you could see someone like Prigozhin (sp?) as potentially having a lot to gain from the attack. It would weaken his rivals with ties to the gas industry, and by "shooting the hostage" make Germany more likely to support Ukraine, leading to a longer, more drawn out war which benefits Wagner in all sorts of ways.
Also, anyone who has ever used an actual aircraft autopilot knows that they are actually very similar to what Tesla has. They relieve you of making constant control inputs need near constant supervision. Is the marketing deceptive, perhaps, but its not incorrect.
I suspect this is a different group.
The CTO in me is horrified at the idea of writing a whole bunch of civet code for it to die a coffeescript style slow death. If it catches on I'll be all over it though.
Please enlighten me as to which “batteries included frameworks” have the market dominance of AWS, React, TypeScript, and Terraform?
Frontend: TypeScript, React, apollo client, graphql-code-generator, tailwind
Backend Logic: Lambda functions written in TS, packaged with serverless.com, but deployed with Terraform
CI: GH Actions
Deployment: AWS via Terraform. One account per environment under an umbrella org.
Because I've used this stack so many times I can get a "shovel ready" foundation going in minutes with a skeleton that I've been iterating on.
However, CF Tunnels were far from ergonomic or easy to use ( https://www.maxcantor.com/blog/2021-10-15-ngrok-to-cloudflar... ).
I'd love a simple tool that fills the gap and I think this is it.
For every warning about an approach being altered or a runway closed, there are 100s of "birds invof airport" or "unlit crane 50' AGL 5 miles from the field" NOTAMs. And even for the relevant NOTAMs, Foreflight will highlight them for approaches etc and ATC won't send you to a closed runway or taxiway.
For the most part it works fine in Brickell and downtown. I put a link to a street view of one tricky intersection above. It also struggles here when you're trying to go south on Miami Ave:https://www.google.com/maps/@25.7626232,-80.1929899,3a,75y,2... basically where the black car is going south it needs to follow the street in a 90deg curve to the right then immediate left at the stop sign. Sometimes it tries to just go straight there, i.e. to where the truck is.
Also, i do often need to "intervene" by pressing the accelerator since the car is a bit to passive for the typical lunatic miami drivers.
With two exceptions, all of my disengagements have been "quality of life" disengagements where I disengaged for reasons other than safety:
* to take a different route or get in the correct lane * to be polite / courteous to a pedestrian who wasn't yet in the crosswalk * to move more quickly through a construction zone or other traffic irregularity.
In none of those cases did I believe that the car was going to cause any risk of an accident, at best there was risk of pissing someone off (which, to be fair, in a city like Miami with far more firearms than judgement could be fatal, but not due to car at all). So yes, these are disengagements, but they weren't dangerous.
There is one case where I do get dangerous disengagements. At the intersection pictured below, when I'm in the position of the white van, sometimes tesla will mistake a green on the far traffic light (which is for the other road, intersecting at a sharp angle) for my road and proceed if it is green even though it is red. Happened twice, haven't noticed on the last version yet. Intersection here: https://www.google.com/maps/@25.750348,-80.2061284,3a,75y,26...
It's all too easy to look at the SEC's absentee mishandling of crypto or whatever and take a dim view of US institutions. But all the way back in 1991, the NTSB was able to look at this accident, with a glaring first order cause of human error on the part of the controller, and recognize that it was actually a systems problem wherein any controller could have made the same mistake. Having agencies take actions like this, instead of a more typical CYA throw-the-individual-under-the-bus approach is something we should all appreciate.
Simple solution:
1) Cities establish guidelines on legal parking / riding. 2) Impose large fines for violations. 3) Scooter companies pass on those fines to the rider who parked illegally.
But instead we have a bunch of blue cities banning the most affordable, equity enhancing, zero emissions, last mile transportation solution.
Also, anecdotally from my flying (I'm a private pilot, small, single engine planes) turbulence tends to create much more vertical translation and pitching movement than it does roll movement.
For engaged, happy engineers its the equivalent of getting a surprise snow day when you are grown up and have to go dig your car out of the snow and its a normal day just with extra steps.