matthewhughes

As I commented above, the design and aesthetic of the GoPro could really be improved.

I think that could move the needle.

But you're right, GoPro is killing it. Tough to beat right now.

I totally agree.

For sports, there is certainly a performance aspect (in this case, aero-dynamics).

But even outside of sports...if you really want people using p-o-v cameras on a regular, everyday basis, the design needs to improve dramatically.

Honestly, I'm not sure what GoPro's software looks like any more? (I assume it's pretty solid.) But that could be an opportunity.

Also, I believe the design and aesthetics could really be improved.

If you really want more people using a p-o-v camera more often, it needs to be a little less intrusive (the GoPro looks pretty awful). A streamlined, low profile camera with the ease and simplicity of a GoPro would be a winner.

VIO is a great product, no doubt.

I made my personal ski movies with my VIO.

I briefly worked for a GoPro competitor: VIO.

Our claim to fame was all of the added features that GoPro didn't have: a remote control, view-finder, advanced editing, et al.

Our price was significantly higher.

We got clobbered.

GoPro's simplicity is its secret weapon.

VIO makes a terrific product but missed the mark in terms of UI/UX.

Thank you to everyone that chimed in so far - much appreciated.

That's good advice - I'll definitely include UI/UX experience on my want/need list.

Thanks -

Voluntary service is a beautiful thing.

I don't like the idea being tossed around in the US about 'mandatory service' - hello oxymoron.

I just sent you an email - thanks.

I'm sure he'd be willing to help - I'll ask him.

Good idea.

It definitely could be more than 'just' a developer role.

As I mentioned in another comment, I'd love to have someone that takes ownership (literally and figuratively) for the project.

That's good advice about pitching the vision and culture - I'll do that for sure.

Yeah, he's a friend and very good at what he does. We worked together over a year ago. I've been talking to him for awhile about this new project but he's just too busy. I understand. Life gets in the way sometimes.

Good to know about oDesk and the like.

I am located in Bend, Oregon but moving (back) to the Bay Area very soon. So I will obviously be in a developer-rich area. (My friend/developer is located in SF.)

Thanks for your advice - it's much appreciated.

I have a concept and am working on building some very rudimentary wireframes but unfortunately I need help building a working prototype.

Edit: hopefully that won't sink me.

No, this will be the second time I've hired.

(I would hire my previous developer again but he recently had a kid and started an intense full time job. So he's out.)

Customer audience is sports-related - coaches in particular.

Customer facing insofar that we'll likely want to raise some money and I'd like this person involved in that process. But not necessarily to attend directly to customer inquiries.

In my mind, a reduced rate + equity would be ideal. I don't want anyone going hungry during the ramping up process but at the same time I'd like them to take ownership and be emotionally invested in the project.

I am willing to consider all of options for the right person.