486 karma · joined June 22, 2016
It’s starting to sound more like a defensive posture than a true concern for society.
Here’s a link to the relevant comment:
https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/42158#issuecomme...
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/01/04/failing-f-35-gr...
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/09/russian-diplomat...
Musk’s tweet here seems a little strange after providing Ukraine with Starlink terminals. Second thoughts, maybe.
https://sweepwings.com/collections/frontpage/products/flinch...
Are the original articles available somewhere?
Alternatively, Beijing may seek to negotiate with or coerce Taipei (or both) in order to allow China sole access to TSMC and block chip exports to the United States, thereby securing China’s own supply while crippling American industry.
But earlier in the article it's mentioned that the US effectively has a "kill switch" on TSMC (by cutting off key supplies needed to fabricate semiconductors). If this is true, then the scenario presented by Blanks seems unlikely -- or am I missing some detail?
The key words being "small efficiencies", but you seldom hear that part of the quote.
[1] https://ubiquity.acm.org/article.cfm?id=1513451 [2] Sir Charles Antony Richard Hoare
[1] https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/coywolf-meet-the-coywolf/860...