A web for the rest of us!
2,184 karma · joined May 21, 2010
A web for the rest of us!
Geez investing is so cynical. :/
Could you put some contact info in your about? I'll send some feedback after I use it for some time.
I just returned from Shanghai and Sanya. There are a lot of dark apartments in Shanghai at night. I know a few Chinese who own multiple apartments, some more than 10, most of these are empty. There are limits to how much they can invest overseas, and I believe investment in real-estate is greatly increased by this.
I feel they have a real-estate bubble of incredible proportions. Everyone talks real-estate too much, and there are too many advertisements for new developments. I don't think this will end well.
In the scheme I'm trying, it costs you karma to upvote or downvote, which gets converted to non-spendable clout. You get a small portion of karma everyday, which increases as you have more clout (and followers, another aspect I added). If you have spent all your karma, you cannot submit stories until you earn some. Here I was trying to limit the effect of users that are new, and of those that have not contributed appreciated content or comments.
That said, you've got me rethinking the idea of karma for submissions... It might be better to have submissions only increase clout. -Therefore, it will only slightly increase a user's karma-earning rate. Good comments will be the best way to get karma. Yes. I am going to try that. Thanks!
Some day, I want to release another edition of the game as a tablet app.
-Cheers
Ok, I am hanging here. What's your favorite RPG?
The underlying concept is actually a pretty heady idea to non-tech folk. It might not hurt to get a bunch of them and bounce things off of them until you see their light bulb turn on. Best of luck!
I agree that /r/ doesn't quite do it. Some of the communities are just too small to pick up on some very good submissions.
Their biggest hurdle is going to be apathy due to a lack of comprehension. The more noob-friendly rstat.us is, the better their chances.
They've actually done much better than most, but it really can't be dumbed down enough. There should be a clear barrier between text for developers, and text for everyone else. I really wish them luck. It's a noble effort.
The tough part is getting tags right. I went the organic route, as I assumed that I would either overlook topics that might be needed, or create redundancies. My site is still too small to see if it works well. I'm not a big fan of the subreddit approach, as I think it divides submissions and attention to a large extent.
I'm working on a site based on news.arc that has tags. They can be followed, and used to sort stories. http://hubski.com
However, hubski is a general news site. Since HN has a focus to begin with, I am not sure how helpful it would be. I would be interested in a custom feed that follows people on HN though. -I have that implemented on my version.
There are some people on Hacker News, where I would like to keep tabs on everything they submit, whether it hits the front page or not.
The city might look like rock-bottom to outsiders, but something is brewing. In 5 years, the headline will be 'is Detroit making a comeback?'.
I'm using Arc, which HN is written in. It is a dialect of Lisp. I love the language actually, but there isn't too much support. I'm just learning. I think I might try another language for my next project.
One reason why I took the approach of following topics and users, rather than subhubs, is that some of the most interesting submissions might only qualify for a hub with very few readers, which is a problem I've encountered with /r/. Here, you can construct a feed in a way similar to the reddit custom frontpage, but you can choose to follow people as well as topics themselves. Thanks again for the thoughts.
-It's too bad this fell off the new page so fast. Maybe I'll try again in a few weeks after some more work. Maybe at a slower time of day too.
The content is from myself, my wife, and several friends. We have a couple of dozen users atm. Hope you check back and see how things progress.
Perhaps by incorporating a Methods Exchange of some sort, you might be able to draw in the Life Science folk a bit more. Although we are cagey about our pubs, we are pretty open to talk about methodology. That could be a project of its own, but the angle might be worth considering.
Best of luck. Bookmarked.
As for my work outside of research, I don't want to cross-advertise in one place.
My guess is that there are leaks that have lingered for quite some time.
It is a fantastic site, but I have the feeling that leaving it has been a relief for those that have. I might be wrong. A bit drunk.
This is what makes a site like HN so great. Crowd-sourcing news analysis provides for such a better experience. I'm still working on my coffee, but I think HN is pointing towards the future of news.
Gmail integration wouldn't hurt either.