157 karma · joined June 13, 2012
The law is correct for when you can assume a constant Te, for example an object within a fluid flow (like an airplane wing during flight). The problem is, for stagnant situations, convection plays a huge role in heat transfer within the air. Controlling convection is really really hard, and even harder in a scientific setting that needs to be reproducible. Also, when dealing with transition temperatures, various things need to be taken care of, such as supercooling. This can literally stop working if your beaker is slightly dirty. So the problem is there isn't a way to universally control the conditions for this experiment. However, I did find that the winner of the RSC paper had a suitable explanation that involves the presence of supercooling for the colder sample of water. Essentially, if the colder sample supercools, it will take slightly more time to freeze, because while it should have frozen, the ice does not have a nucleation site. On the other hand, the warmer sample does not supercool, and freezes upon reaching 0 C. This experiment only works if the temperature difference is slight, probably within 15-30 C. Quite ingenious really!
Edit: After reading the rest of the comments, air bubble/filtered water/de-ionized water all have great effects on ice nucleation and supercooling, which for me supports the winner's paper.
In the meanwhile, I am also working on a project myself, and could use an experienced team to help build the prototype. Let's discuss both projects! Email in profile.
edit: This is essentially SRS for anatomy? Cool, good idea. Nice detailed pictures as well.
I'm not sure why you had to ask me if I am sure, when you could have easily corroborated or discredited my statement by checking yourself. And if you did, why didn't you post your own conclusion?
" the clients are all free to shop for the services of another provider". I don't even know how to respond to this one. What percentage of people can afford private school? Did you even read this? He resigned due to the increasing amount of government regulations and his lack of control over his own classroom. How many "private practice" teachers even exist? 10%? 5%?
"recognize that plenty of people like the current system just fine". That wasn't the point of this article by far. It was one teacher's experience, not an editorial on how everyone hates the system. But if you bring up the point, please cite your sources. Show me what government employed teachers like the current system just fine.
I really can't believe you referred to a student as a client. It just feels to me completely against the spirit of education.
This is a surprisingly hard problem that I've explored before. Feel free to email me about it!
That said, try posting examples if you want more feedback?
I'm not familiar with these issues however, so I'll refrain from posting more haphazard advice. I just feel the OP could make some more effort.