malms

plus amy would be fired because she has no work anymore

this is nice

None of it qualify as interesting to peopple interested by phds.

You can also be coerced by the lack if money

Its not singled out. There are labor laws in general that prevent possibly consenting people to work more (at least in europe)

it's still nimby too

this is literally nimby

funny how everything you do in your life time can be forgotten and and you are labeled a crooked for the smallest amount of corruption

"may the one who never sinned throw a rock at me"

Theres also the general problem of the truthness of what people write about you online .. anyone can write anything so it shoulg be at least defendable to be kept

So the law is only for google ? That make 0 sense

how is that creating such a list not serve the opposite purpose of the law ??

read the article

Python

"IBM"

Next

They did it to protect themselves from patent trolls.

Yes and then you can't unsee it

> Responsibility for justice.

That's one of the most stupid politically correct ideas of the modern times. Thinking descendants of perpetrators owe anything to descendant of victim fails to account that, in most cases, the victims would actually have done the same than th eperpetrators had they be in the similar position of power (see slavery / natives vs europeans). It's bullshit. It's human nature that people abuse people. It's never a race/ people / specific group issue.

providing the system on which is based a major criteria for scientist's career advancement

not saying it's good, just that it's a fact

> I'm not sure why this is considered acceptable

Because ads make money to all parties except the user.

I agree with you but that's none of my point.

My point is just that you have to weight the cost: it provided tremendous value through the system of journals, while not really giving a "real" drawback since everyone in research who has ever wanted to get a given paper in the past 5 decades has been able to find it despite the locking by trying hard enough to bypass it.

i don't even understand the downvotes: i don't agree with the system and Elsevier can die but my point is just that they never were a really tangible "problem". Mostly a "1rst world problem".

She's a superstar now, could make money from ad or bribes with no personal risk. I would have done the same

It's not a "problem". elsevier has been creating actual value for years. It's becoming a problem now precisely because we think they are creating more problems than value.

It's always the value market which dictates what happens. Even a dictator has provide values for enough people (not necessarily its citizen) to stay in power.

> incurable medical condition

which is ? seriously wondering

Read the people answering the tweet:

Actually they didn't. They just hid the option

> If you believe your system is better, then you really should not have to actively participate in fighting opposing systems of belief. Forcing it through just shows that you are motivated by self interest, and not a core belief in the superiority of your own values.

Uh why ? I think it's exactly the opposite

it's just your opinion

Skydiving isnt more dangerous than riding a motorbike daily.

Also even though a agree with your bigger point its not really what happens here. People are just being stupid here, not even understanding they are playing with their life.

Its even more bullshit then

Does that use the real trajectories of the planets (such as give by the JPL ephemerides) or or eliptical approximations ?

you are missing the truth and goal of such an article. people here think they are a counterpower to evil actors with their keyboards. The truth doesn't matter and you are going into the sense of enabling police instead of being acting as a counter power.

(just explaining the downvotes)