Choking game, also known as the fainting game
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
I understand that people place a different value on their life, and things like skydiving are thrilling and life changing with a chance of death if something goes wrong. I don't always share the same risk/reward profile that is neccesary for someone to asphyxiate for thrills.
[1] One as a child doing this using a plastic bag and one as an adult presumably practicing the erotic version.
Also even though a agree with your bigger point its not really what happens here. People are just being stupid here, not even understanding they are playing with their life.
I bet it's considerably higher than per hour of crusing around on a motorbike...
There were 390 motorcyclist deaths per billion vehicle miles in the USA in 2006. Assuming motorbikes average ~40mph (between city and highway), that works out a death every 64,000 motorbike-hours.
So skydiving is significantly more dangerous per unit time.
>> bet it's considerably higher than per hour of cruising around on a motorbike..
I would imagine so as well."Haaf was described as an experienced skydiver with over 1,200 jumps and was a frequent visitor to Skydive Cross Keys" https://www.courierpostonline.com/story/news/local/south-jer...
The Wikipedia article has fleshed out since then to include some risks, and links to asphyxiation for a more thorough analysis. We had no idea why it happened at the time.
That doesn't seem too dangerous to me, compared to many other dangerous activities teenagers do.
The number of children who died on farms back in the 1800s early 1900s probably eclipses this number by a few orders of magnitude.
Not saying this is a bad thing. But I think about it a lot as a new-ish parent trying to navigate the layers upon layers of extra safety that my parents find a little absurd.
The very first time I saw one of my friends do this, I didn't believe he had actually passed out, so I lightly tossed a tennis ball at his crotch and he didn't react at all. I felt bad when he woke up in pain though, but I honestly thought he was faking. He was out for maybe 20-30 seconds.
The second time this girl we all knew did it, and we freaked out because everyone normally woke up in under a minute, but she didn't wake up for almost four minutes.
We started discouraging people from doing it after that.
Glad I wasn’t killed now that I think about it. Definitely would chalk it up to curiosity and a bit of peer pressure.
Nothing, although some people will come up with explanations to say that “this article is interesting and that’s why it was upvoted” but the reality is, today is Sunday, and Sundays are always characterized by random —usually non-tech related— articles in the front page. I personally don’t mind it, this is a good way to learn about topics that usually people don’t talk about. To me, it feels like clicking the “Random Article” link on WikiPedia [1].
On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
As I've learned over the years, what's off-topic for me, isn't necessarily off-topic for everyone else. Lots of articles on HN that have left me bored, but turns out they work for other people.
I posted this because I found it interesting to finally understand what the fainting game was, and how dangerous it could have been. I suppose it resonated with other people too.
Being hypoxic briefly isn’t likely to kill you. But doing it over and over and over, or using a plastic bag, or... fainting and hitting your head. Those are reasons you might die.