macilacilove

Important for many, but that is just normal news.

Looks beautiful. Its always exciting to push the boundaries of what an app can do. I wonder if my breathing makes any sound at all.

What is your experience with the medical device registration process so far? Is such medical innovation well recepted or does regulation seem to largely benefit established players?

I think the point is to get it to erase(padd) its own context so then the most probable sequences in an "empty" state often matches training data.

I think for regular GPT (not instruction tuned) you could just start a wikipedia article verbatim and it would likely continue reciting.

I used similar prompts in the past to test how may words needed to exhaust the context length and forget previous instructions. I think you are doing that.

For generic words like "text text text ..." it would start random musings on the soviet union and the star wars etc. But it had lots of made up characters so not training data directly.

Recently I got disconnects for such prompts wondering it got censored by openai.

So the tweet says "Communities of some people A push hate against people B"

I assume these companies are standing up for a moral principle.

The principle is that communities in general are incapable of hate so any such accusation is worthless at best or actively harmful?

Or is it that in the specific instances of A and B it is not true? But then it is a weaker principle because truth sometimes can not be known for certain.

There is not a lot of benefits to it besides it being awesome. Maybe some HFT firms could benefit from the low latencies in orbit.

Because some androgenes (including testosterone) are performance enchancing drugs that increase your competitiveness and risk tolerance in a wide variety of activities but takes a toll on your body in the long run. Castrated men live longer and I think similar lifespans compared to women.

This probably has evolutionary roots, as men have a much higher variability in the number of offsprings they can have, therefore great 'wins' have greater payoffs for them.

If you count at the polling locations, most countries manage it in 24 hours for the most part and public scools/libraries can reopen on monday.

The purpose of the election is to 1 .: measure public support of candidates. 2.: convince the population that it has been fairly measured.

It is quite clear that some of the last two elections failed at the convincing part.

Give everyone mandatory 3 hours off on election day(which would be saturday so most people dont work anyway) and you are fine. Noone is "disenfranchised". This appears an excuse not a serious issue and just about every country managed to solve it.

just to reiterate. Dont just focus on candidates lieing about fraud. They do it. Also focus on independent verifiability of the fairness of the process where the USA is severely lacking.

Well, don't vote for weeks. Vote for one day, on Saturday, count in place, allow anyone to watch from stamping to final count. Vote in person, _require_ photo id. Don't allow mail in voting except in very limited cases(overseas military maybe).

There is complaint that people don't trust the elections, but there are common sense methods to improve said trust that don't involve following links to .edu websites. You know that a lot of people don't trust scientists.

I am not saying there is fraud. (I do say however that the candidates of the two partes and the results would be quite different if above changes were introduced.)

With severe throttling it might become an energy efficient but slow chip when needed.

Lack of photographic voter id in certain states, Mail in voting/drop off boxes, Transporting of Votes to counting locations, and other issues that raise security concerns.

These are some of the bad practices that are generally rejected by countries that present themselves as democratic.

Edit: also, how is it "their senate" this time, but "our democracy" in one of your previous comments?

Have you lost your US citizenship in the last 2 hours?

Keep in mind that from a European perspective the US has the _least secure_ elections among the countries that are considered democratic. Even some of the non-democratic countries have better elections.

So what? Mindfulness was supposed to be about your _mind_ and not about _minding_ (caring) other peoples issues.

Can someone explain why Microsoft has overall the strongest negative correlation with Activision/Blizzard(-0.87) on a 1 year basis. That must be related to the aquistion but I can not figure out how.

Since NSO claimed that they only sold to national governments, this means Pegasus was used cross-border, or NSO lied about that. (maybe both)

EU does pay. But then EU 'freezes' the Euro account that the payment went to, effectively erasing the transaction, right? From the Russian perspective the rouble is much less fake money.

That dial exists and it calls the Saudi king and reminds him that he wants to increase oil production if he prefers himself untoppled.

Type 2 diabetes is not curable with diet. Some (but not all) cases of type 2 can be _prevented_ by proper diet (i.e. avoiding obesity). There is no known diet that cures any type of existing diabetes.

Maybe they calculate that too much outrage will make Russia appear more powerful especially if at the same time Western leaders are not going to do that much(not sure if they will).

Maybe they want to save face for politicians who - people will argue - mishandled this crisis.

Maybe it is just not really true, despite some people saying it on the internet.

He does not say that NATO expands to antagonize Russia, just that Russia will inevitably see it that way, and if the situation was reversed, where China has a military alliance at US border it would be seen the same way from the United States too.

Moreover he explicitly says that NATO/US does not want to expand to Ukraine as it is not a vital strategic interest to the United States, instead US will have to focus on Asian alliances to counter China.

Although I am certainly not well informed, as I could not predict this scale of military operation, I'd like to say that "consensus of international media" is not worth much at times of war. Because I feel like there is never a lot of disagreement in media during such crises. Maybe after, when the situation calmed.

Nice! I want may project start cheap, and then scale 'automatically' as demand grows. My nightmare is to have an outage when my project is most popular. How do you deal with this if I deploy with you?

Very promising project, (and seems very good fit for HN too) keep up the good work!

Each EU country is perfectly capable of intruducing such laws if they feel like it. I don't see the benefit of the EU forcing this regulation on the whole bloc.

I imagine participation being tied to verifiable (but potentially private in some contexts) real world identity. This is needed for voting to make sense too. In such arrangement it seems not difficult to discourage spamming. As I see spamming strives in circumstances where it is possible to create lots of untraceable identities almost freely.

Ukraine is at the brink of a humanitarian catastrophe, where Western powers regularly encourage color revolutions bringing the country to a point of civil war. "The west" has virually no skin in the game but leaders would prefer Russia sanctioned and isolated so that once again US has unchallanged superpower status.

Meanwhile, as discussed, Russia, Ukraine and EU have a lot to lose in a devastating and bitter war. At the same time Russia is obliged to keep stability and relative prosperity in the region for its citizens at home and Russian nationals abroad.

The best route for Russia is to defend the status quo as passively as possible while waiting for the Ukrainians to realize that for the "west" Ukraine's destruction is about as good as Russia's. And I think this route is feasible for Putin, so this will happen(not much).

I don't have a full solution, but as much as possible we need direct democratic control over how the algorithm works and tools to verify that it follows the agreed rules. Social networks should not be owned by "some guy" just as the court and the police, rather work according to the rules of society.

Zuckerberg should probably be compensated for the wealth he created, but he is not entitled to this level of control over sociaty.

You dont need any propaganda machine to see that countries that are furthest from the conflict geographically and economically have the least to lose. That is why the warmongerist representing US/UK war efforts in every conflict is so excited about the situation.

Your Honor, I did not steal that car because theft happened countless times without me.

> “He is a menace to every casino in Europe,” casino owner, Signor Lardera, told the Sydney Morning Herald. “I don’t know how he does it exactly, but if he never returned to my casino I would be a very happy man.”

Signor Lardera was quite a gentleman.

Does that mean that if we wern't here, natural overpopulation of methane-emitting animals could have caused similar levels of global warming by "accident"?