There at least the giant lily needs to be pollinated by hand as they are lacking the specialized beetles https://www.botmuc.de/en/audio_tour/202.html so I'd assume some gardens do think about these matters.
56 karma · joined September 5, 2018
There at least the giant lily needs to be pollinated by hand as they are lacking the specialized beetles https://www.botmuc.de/en/audio_tour/202.html so I'd assume some gardens do think about these matters.
So if the whole process of spec'ing and validating the quality of sourced materials was within their action space, ofc they'd choose (potential) fault-tolerance over price, as it was mission critical.
So there might be a reason why we refer to it today as space race and not race to the bottom.
Having a REST API means the complete setup is easier to tinker with through a defined protocol and not having to resort to hack with the bulbs or any zigbee/low-level things.
I used this to play a bed time indication sequence on multiple bulbs in the living room from MIDI notes.
Also if you managed to build, prepare (App Store metadata in different resolutions etc), submit and finally get your app shipped to the end user that was no small feat a couple of years ago. Probably not a very useful skillset to have if you only do it very infrequently (read: waste of time).
Requiring additional screenshots, icon sizes, universal app (iPhone+iPad, also supporting split view), new copy for different types of meta (e.g app sub title) for all the locales you probably had translated externally at some point, new privacy guidelines etc.. all not very attractive to get into even if not forced to update like this, especially if you lose your ratings in the process.
Looking at the amount of money that is spent on nation-level campaigning (for a term length of ~4 years) the sum short would be minuscule when compared to near-global reach to be gained, so maybe the total of folks chipping in one way or another weights in much more p.a. than what currently is "on the table".
Sometimes the right kind of intuition is all it needs to make it click. Sometimes it's that tiny bit of knowledge one is missing to get the whole picture and suddenly everything makes sense.
(Btw I think we might have met ages ago at a conference or two in Cologne)
Never really thought deeply about the why, but probably related to some of the offers appearing more relevant to me (in terms of context and not browsing history/social graph) .
Hopefully our solar system isn't the only place where human DNA is found; that said, I'm curious what'll be left of humans as we know today.
With tools like CRISPR accelerating adoption to new environments and increased resilience towards hostile situations (zero-g, radiation etc)
Thinking further I might have silently adopted a self-imposed "keep track of edit states and memoization in the wetware stack" approach, which I realize now is something that is far more exhausting than offloading to the tools whose purpose it is to show where the missing bits are.
My usual pain point with eclipse was mostly package refactoring always leading to tree conflicts with SVN repos.
But that was ages ago and back then using Idea was way ahead of eclipse wrt refactoring and overall developer experience/productivity for us.
[1] has a chart showing the percentage of kids born in 2012 getting full measles vaccination within their first two years by county.
[1] https://www.sueddeutsche.de/bayern/oberbayern-murnau-hauptst...
I‘m aware that emulators nowadays ship with tube distortion and scanline filters/shaders, but is there a more "physical model"-based approach that properly implements raster and pixel over-/afterglow?
So from a security perspective it's way easier to review/audit functional code.
As others have noted it all boils down to user agent support. Otherwise most publishers probably won't consider giving up ad or subscription financed models.
Also, forcing users into subscriptions allows for better demographics data/statistics.
However, I quickly came to the realization that the metrics I'd try to alter would probably not be sufficient and reveal enough information that the whole thing would be rendered moot.
A nice first step to remediate trust (or at least shift trust relationship to other parties) would be for vendors to implement highly restricted sandbox models (i.e. not allowing _any_ network access and restrict/alter ways of in- and output, like adding noise and artefacts to image data that can leave the app e.g. via share/save to camera roll).
Its purpose is synchronizing app state data across devices via iCloud.
[1] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsubiqu...
I also DONT want those devices to be able to connect to the internet: I have a D-Link webcam that has (had?) some issues around being exploitable remotely via the MyDLink or whatever it‘s called service. I don’t want to have (more) devices sitting in my network that open it up from the inside.
Also I need my guests should be able to access the internet without me having to whitelist their MAC address.
It‘s mostly a blend of many different tutorials/blog posts/forums on hostapd, raspbian, dnsmasq and the likes.
I took notes during both times when I set this up (first time the sdcard died shortly after, no backup of sorts; second time some changes in drivers, raspbian lite and other tooling were different so I had to start over).
I thought this project would make a good first blog post, maybe I can gist some steps / bullet points next week or so.
I also do run HomeKit, homebridge but devices/hubs are in the dedicated network.
As mentioned by others, I guess it really needs severe identity theft/abuse with vital services until people realize that today‘s IoT 'plug & play' is worse than than the level of 'plug & pray' we‘ve seen in the early PCI/USB/Win98 era (that only impacted your local device functionality).
If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a software project.
Using my series 1 watch at the supermarket later worked like a charm.
Great experience!
Looking forward to me educating cashiers about this for the next couple of months (still have some of them trying to grab my card)
Looking forward to check out this one.
Thanks for sharing!
It‘s also hard to describe but the best analogy I can come up with: picture a CMS that actually is about _content_ instead of being tied to presentation. So e.g. writing an article about a certain historical event at a certain place consists of stringing all the information and relationships together.
Bringing the correct pieces together eliminates errors and gives a piece of information more meaning when used in different contexts.
Being able to correctly reference e.g. Venice, Italy instead of Venice LA, CA makes a huge difference when looking up time schedules, weather forecast, flight connections etc. Sure there are IATA codes for airports. Wouldn‘t it be great to mention Springfield in an article and having all information about that place (as well as all „backlinks“)?
I also don‘t think it is a technology problem.
However, I‘d like to think about this more in terms of DRY principle of information. There are publications on the web that solely exist to duplicate short-lived, relatively low quality information and putting ads on it. This may be acceptable for some consumer‘s point of view, but fails to create long-lasting contribution to mankind.
Just dumping all bits we currently store into massive archives is possible but taking measures to keep the amount of „information archeology“ needed to understand this data feels the right thing to do.
I‘ll iterate on that.
Sorry if this reads even more confusing and esoteric, need some sleep now.
I think it won’t work if the underlying transport/presentation is „the web“ (i.e as in Web 2.0).
Instead of decorating semantics/hints around the actual information mostly for SEO reasons it should work the opposite: using all available semantic hints and information bits there already are to create new information by aggregating and putting things in a new context.
It adds value while building upon previous knowledge and allows information and context to be relevant indefinitely.
When „designing“ views I tend to face challenges from the other end of the spectrum: „what am I going to put here so there‘s not too much empty/negative space on the larger screens without making the layout look empty or clunky?“