82 karma · joined April 30, 2024
In the current online discourse climate...
The HN community can be a good candidate to collectively, over time and use... develop and refine a set of commonly understood tags to communicate context in post titles.
If not in title, then maybe in the top / "pinned" comment.
If they can spread beyond HN... that would be even better.
(Since there are posts on economy related factors and the OP was about Nazi Germany)
At a different level is this somewhat reflective of USA today? (USA today is by no means poor, although it is true that the bottom 50% has stagnated for quite long)
while using QUIC (and MP-QUIC) over WAN / Internet?
and the other comments on lack of MPTCP support from middleboxes, my guess is even for Apple first party apps, out in the wild, might not see much MPTCP use?
I worry about cuts to departments that is on clean energy, EV, sustainability in general. (For thinking that Musk is in that industry so it wouldn't happen, there's consideration that cuts on Govt support in that area will actually benefit the one that's ahead.. that's Tesla for the charging network, the EV sales, the peaker plant replacements, etc.)
https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/12/11/afghanistan-papers-detai...
Imagine if every bad thing USA did... people want USA to "pay dearly"...
Not a snark.. it's quite eye opening to see (and actually use) how much food a piece of commercial kitchen equipment processeses in a day and then how much effort it takes to clean them.
An example of cleaning a commercial deep fryer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFR5CN_kuI0
One can also try googling for other more detailed versions showing all the efforts in digging out all the burnt sediments/sludge :)
In a highly partisan landscape with increasing geopolitical tensions, is ownership a key risk to objective news? Is diversification of ownership of news sources a good way to help mitigate that? If so, any good ideas from the HN crowd?
https://www.nrta.gov.cn/art/2024/9/19/art_114_68922.html
translated : https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&text=https%3A%2F...
Are private attempts to preserve human knowledge (e.g. IA keeps it offline from public access but continues to archive new works) legal in USA and other major jurisdictions?
Been itching to upgrade my beloved Libra H20.
Thanks in advance.
IMHO more appropriate would be "low skilled labour".
We should use the correct term when describing jobs that require little specialised skill and separate them from the persons performing it (who may be very skillful in other non-related areas).
If there is cultural stigma in using this term, should we sacrifice accuracy and succinctness in technical/professional discussions on related topics by dancing around with terminologies? If we "evolve" and use a new term that is not currently associated with the same stigma, will this neutral term eventually still be associated with the same stigma? If so, is it worth the effort and penalties (e.g. interim confusion) as a whole?
I am genuinely curious about this, I think there are many good points on "both sides of the coin".
Dr. Ian Cutress did a video of his thoughts. (Just a subscriber of his channel)
Did a quick google and found examples such as this: https://www.comparably.com/companies/nvidia/work-life-balanc...
Doesn't look that bad from an "Asian work culture" perspective.
Is Nvidia more functionally organized or BU organized. From your experience, are functionally organized highly performing companies' meetings generally more passionate, while BU organized highly performing companies' meetings generally more political?
IMHO Jeff Geerling's recent video on RISC-V is a good update for those not tracking RISC-V closely, the links in the description are also useful.
Why did it successfully pass in UK (and other countries) and what are the differences in the version passed in UK in actual requirements (to businesses) and protections (to children) compared to this one?
Actual legislation at https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.x...
(No affiliation with Framework, can't even buy one since they don't ship to where I live yet.. bummer.)
The various creators I used to follow on Nebula have no ads at all in the videos published in Nebula, compared to those they post on Youtube. Not sure if its applicable for all creators on Nebula though.
(A parallel is Netscape Navigator vs Microsoft bundling Internet Explorer)
Lastly, a gentle reminder since I too sometimes slip up and fondly recall the good old six-colored apple... that Apple has been the top 3 largest company by market capitalisation for more than 10 years. They are underdogs no more.
Those that have more pressing needs or have more aligned opportunities will invest first, then the cost goes down as the scale and technology improves, and the global network is built.
Geopolitics might be a big stumbling block though.
I wonder if we can do the same for electricity distribution, mitigating the uneven electricity generation of solar (day vs night, summer vs winter, etc.)
IMHO Verge's article is a useful summary without Google's corpspeak.
outlined, patience for platform building.
I think it's quite important for the industry to have a reference for XR (AR + VR) where the focus is on accurate assessment of the user's immediate physical surroundings and provide for non-fatiguing interactivity, especially after Hololens practically disappeared. I hope Vision Pro lasts much longer than Hololens (didn't miss Ping, but certainly miss 3D touch).
Meta's headsets focus on bringing the user into another world, another important but different reference point.
Microsoft, for now, is moving backwards on the sustainability front in pursuit of AI. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-15/microsoft...