2,319 karma · joined March 12, 2017
A potential threat does not count. China potentially threatens the destruction of the west coast by nukes, so by your argument the US should have gone to war long ago if potential threats count.
But for most people that I saw accessing the internet the first time it clicked immediately and they were hooked.
I would expect support from such a language to support me with I/O while I concentrate on my program. For example by providing an event loop.
Of course, if I need a more performant approach I would switch to a low level language.
Do you have a link to a good one?
[1] https://elixirschool.com/en/lessons/basics/pipe_operator
When I was still in academia I avoided close source because I want my research to be accessible. It does make a difference if you need to go through some strange license portal to activate your university license or if you can just install it in one line.
For me that meant that my scripts run in octave as good as in matlab, if this was feasible (and of course many packages exist only for matlab).
Feel free to come up with something new that supports Markdown as a subset or overlaps with Markdown.
Let’s say you are a beginner programmer and good with excel. If you are now doing a lot of excel jobs (and your manager agrees that you should do it) then you progress at excel and less at programming. So your buddies might get promoted to senior programmers while you stay the underpaid excel guy.
You should make sure that you get extra education to catch-up if people ask you to spend time on dead ends.
If you’re honest the page for measles could be just as confusing as the covid19 page. But CDC is confident to simplify it to a single number.
But let’s assume that the Covid19 vaccines provides a solid 70% protection during the first year. That’s still ten times more people vulnerable than after the measles vaccination! The disappointment is justified.
I thought meanwhile everyone agreed that the vaccines are very weak at providing sterile immunity?!
Also you didn’t cite a number of efficacy. Clicking through the many cases I come up with something less than 40% (protection against infection) within a year. If you compare that with the 97% for lifetime (measles) you can understand the disappointment of the people and why they don’t want to call it a vaccine.
The ancestral strain results were (naturally) also only of the kind: 95% protection for 3 months (or was the study period only 1 month?). Of course nobody could know for sure. But to many it was no surprise that the virus would escape any vaccine quickly just like the flu.
OTOH: From all data I saw, I agree that the vaccine improved the chances of survival of the elderly.
What’s the number for Covid19?
And why wasn’t it in the sheets when I was compelled to vaccinate? If I remember correctly the sheet back then stated that it may not protect against Covid19 at all.
How do you arrive at that conclusion? How does it compare to other means of payment?
I don’t doubt that it is used for criminal activities. But I doubt that the scope is extra ordinary.
> conversations with Ex San Quentin prisoners
I heard Maddoff was involved with NASDAQ. Does it imply NASDAQ is a fraud?
I’m surprised that it apparently had to be delivered physically. Did Comodo generate the private key for you?
His readers are at loss. Their book won’t come into existence.