Still not usable in vscode and Deepseek because the lead dev decided to require an arbitrary opencode specific header?
175 karma · joined February 19, 2022
Some folks don’t want others to be happy. I had someone in my life recently complain that someone they met was too happy and thus toxic and ignorant of the world’s atrocities.
Keep smiling at have a good day :)
This is absolutely not a small draft review or edit.
When the company I work for was evaluating it, there were multiple rough points. Their terms and conditions allowed training on prompts, the default behavior was to route prompts to their servers for conversation summary/labeling. One of their lead maintainers is also super toxic on many issues.
Sorry this is all baseless with no links, I’m on my phone and locating those issues again isn’t something I have time for.
It’s a good tool I just don’t like the privacy policies nor maintainers attitudes.
The top student giving paid lectures about his classes, and another student skipping class and instead studying those lectures to end up with the second highest grade?
Maybe it could be improved with the other student not even going to the same school?
I always expect a failed billing or no billing info after a trial to cancel and not be pursued (I regularly do trials with a temp card that I immediately de-activate so it cannot be billed in case I forget to cancel)
Why assume a large swath of the community is coping or low trust factor and that instead your experience is the only accurate one?
I have too many hours in cs:go and cs2 and am level 10 FACEIT. I have had many awful cheater experiences in the native competitive systems but have never had an obvious cheater (never reported someone) in a FACEIT match.
It works. It raises the bar high enough that cheating is significantly less frequent.