1,337 karma · joined August 4, 2013
My point is that if they agreed to merge projects and wahoo didn't keep their license on it, then that code at the time of agreement is no longer under the exclusive copyright of the wahoo author.
If oh-my-fish didn't include the copyright notice and permission notice for wahoo's code they were using, then this is a valid use of the DMCA.
MIT doesn't mean you're free to use with abandon. You still have to credit and provide the license.
However, the author cannot enforce that they don't use the 'wahoo' repo. If oh-my-fish attributes correctly, and includes wahoo's license, then they can use it.
http://www.macrumors.com/2014/10/09/third-yosemite-golden-ma...
Also, I get that regex is how you do it on iOS9 and it's fast on there because of Apple's specific regex implementation, but you're misleading people that your 7 humongous regex are going to be faster than flagship blockers (uBlock Origin) on the desktop.
I believe that footnote is a doc error, since copy/cut are enabled w/o user.js override on FF 41+.
I don't know if there is any current plans to make "paste" available for all scripts - I don't think there would be because of the obvious concerns.
There is no API for reading from the clipboard, just writing to it.
The benefits of having a flashless copy/cut function greatly outweigh the off chance some random site will copy something stupid to your clipboard if you interact with it.
Can someone explain what exactly HTTP2 is doing differently to achieve such an improvement?
None of the Math.x functions work, e.g. Math.floor(2.5). Defining functions also doesn't work.
Looks promising though, I would use it for scratching project euler problems.
Even if it was just an interpretation, chances are FB would have a strong case in court. Pretty much every artistic and expressive UI/UX element from the original site has been copied and placed on the nuggets site. There's not really anything being creatively added or remixed by the nuggets creator.
If insane shit like patents on rounded app icons and the iTunes "music note" logo gets regularly brought to court and settled[1], then copying the entire L&F of a site is definitely infringing.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung_Electron....
Copying licensed code, like this: (left rooms.me, right nuggetsapp) https://www.diffchecker.com/gmudwop7
is I L L E G A L, and I M M O R A L. Letting it slide is not okay!
You forget to take out links to their site. (bottom right)
Pretty dumb move, considering rooms.me is by FB, and there's bound to a be FB people looking on HN.
For example, CNN's Terms of Service reads:
"You may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale, create derivative works, or in any way exploit, any of the content, in whole or in part. You may download copyrighted material for your personal use only. Except as otherwise expressly permitted under copyright law, no copying, redistribution, retransmission, publication or commercial exploitation of downloaded material will be permitted without the express permission of CNN and the copyright owner."
The other sites you liked have similar clauses.
You may only use the images and article excepts if your usage is Fair Use, which you can learn more about here. http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/
I suspect your "news aggregator app" is however, NOT FAIR USE, which means you cannot pull their content without their consent.
IANAL, but work around a bunch of them.
Today, the copyright term is pushing 110+ years, in part thanks to Disney.
That means the next Walt Disney has to pull from increasingly culturally irrelevant works that are 3, 4 generations old rather than one.
For more details, see the CTEA (aka "The Mickey Mouse Protection Act") https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Term_Extension_Act
"Tor hidden service traffic, which Dr. Gareth Owen discussed in his talk this afternooon, is only 1.5% of all Tor traffic. Tor gets about 2 million users per day total.
The researcher ran a set of Tor relays for a six month period, and recorded how many times somebody attempted to look up a hidden service (this lookup is one of the steps in visiting a hidden service). Then at the end of that period, he scanned the hidden services he'd learned about, to find out what sort of content was on them.
Dr. Owen's data shows that there's a lot of churn in hidden services, so nearly all of the sites were gone by the time he did these scans. His graphs only show data about the sites that were still up many months later: so his data could either show a lot of people visiting abuse-related hidden services, or it could simply show that abuse-related hidden services are more long-lived than others. We can't tell from the data.
Without knowing how many sites disappeared before he got around to looking at them, it's impossible to know what percentage of fetches went to abuse sites.
There are important uses for hidden services, such as when human rights activists use them to access Facebook or to blog anonymously. These uses for hidden services are new and have great potential.
PS: Law enforcement agencies use Tor to stay anonymous while they catch bad guys. Law enforcement agencies use and run hidden services, too." https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-80-percent-percent-1-2-...
Because of its privacy settings, this video cannot be played here."
After the beta: we haven't decided on a final pricing system. We're shooting around ideas of doing a tier system.
And about running your own learntomod server:
At this stage we aren't letting people run their own learntomod server, the only exception being 3rd party hosting companies that want to make it available to their users.