lemonade

Maybe you want to check out https://nlnet.nl/NGI - and make a suggestion...

Other useful hint to authors: the Starter Pack seems to be missing on the server ...

Hi Pieter,

I'm not sure how long you'll keep on reading stuff, but rest assured me and many others will cherish the very fond memories of collaborating with you - you've always had a sharp wit and a practical sort of unconventionalism that gets things done. We have much to thank you for.

We worked together on Digistan and the "The Hague Declaration", which I helped host in The Hague - and I think it still is a strong statement that is worth repeating. People can sign that declaration:

http://www.digistan.org

I'm very much saddened to hear about your disease - and deep respect for the way you handle this unannounced change of plan. I hope your remaining time will be spent with those you love looking back on a rich life where you've left the world better than it is - and got the max out of it. I'll send you an email, so that when your kids are older and want to know about the things you've done they can contact me. Take care, my friend.

You don't often see using PHP advertised as a desirable feature in any place where you could avoid it.

"Safe browsing" is one of the first things I turn off when installing a new profile in a browser. I personally dislike any commercial service turned on by default in my software that continually and without my consent pings back to some place on the net - using my real IP address and leaking anything remotely related to destination addresses. And cookies?

I think there should be better ways of protection than trusting such a service anyway.

Alternatively, you can use mosh to your homebox, and run mutt from there. Has some other advantages as well ...

This is in all likelyhood "Safebrowsing by Google", which is a default service to run sites you visit past the servers of said company.

https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/safebrowsing/diagn...

That would make you one of the 600 million people using that service, whether you realise it or not.

Alas, other browsers use it too without any warning, although you can turn it off it is not easily discoverable:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430741

As suggested, add sb.google.com or whatever endpoint is used to /etc/hosts or HOSTS file.

Well, Blackberry still has quite a few governments as its customer, and will continue to have them for a while. And as I recall, the N9 still sold millions of devices even though it was no longer receiving any promotion. The consumer market is not the only road to success.

I also would like to think that after the Snowden revelations Nokia would have been able to convince many organisations that security and privacy are not dead, and that ones mobile phone is probably the most invasive technology in use.

It goes where you go, it listens to what you say, it reads what you read. It should have only one master - its owner. So far Jolla never had the scale, the public visibility or the political profile of Nokia as the European champion of technology. That story could have been told by Nokia far better.

Actually, these are suggestions from users to Jolla. It just shows how people care about this small company doing what the world needs now - make smartphones that don't phone home all the time, and that allow you to install a firewall, inspect what software is really running, block any service you don't want to give network access, run your trusted open source toolchains for whatever you need them for and all those other tiny things that make a real difference from the rest of the industry.

Also, it is because they are not bankrupt. The original title is plainly misleading. They are restructuring.

As a happy Jolla user (my whole family has one), I hope they make it. If you don't have one yet - I encourage you to order one. It is something different, and a feeling of 'just buying a phone, not a surveillance tool" that no other phone on the market can give you.

They could do with your help. If you want to buy but are scared you might lose money doing so because of non-news like this: under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act, your credit card company is jointly liable if something goes wrong with a product or a service you've paid for by credit card. So if anything fails, you get your money from the credit card company. If it doesn't, you'll have a great phone and instant real karma.

I don't think your analysis of the whole "Microsoft buying Nokia" is correct. Nokia did not offload, but had no money left to defend itself against an aggressor. Basically, they were led to the slaughterhouse by the "burning platform" message from a former Microsoft employee.

The way Elop treated Nokia's technologically superior platform was very transparently not in the interest of Nokia. The subsequent sale must have landed him a lot of money. I'm curious what Elop is doing now ...

Please see my other comments. They are not bankrupt. They are having significant financial issues, but debt restructuring is actually something that can work really well - the channel tunnel is the living example of this.

I for one am going to order some spare batteries for my phone. That might give them some extra cash, and it is time to do so anyway ...

Well, it is because they are not bankrupt. The title is misleading and incorrect, and outdated.

[edit] The title was changed, much better - thanks. Buying is still possible, and if you've held out because you thought Jolla did not need you - it does.

The original title was changed because it was incorrect. Jolla has to make some financial restructuring. The Jolla blog posts are more up to date than this, but IRC might even be better.

Am I missing something? This leads to a wiki page that does not actually say anything about a bankruptcy.

Can you either substantiate or remove - remaining sailors seem to be working very hard, and I would hate it if false rumors would seed negative energy ...

You might want to look at:

https://tlspool.arpa2.net/

The original academic paper from MIT describing how it works:

http://www.ksplice.com/doc/ksplice.pdf

The original KSplice project was actually fully open source, funded by a Dutch charity called NLnet that funds lots of interesting projects like that. I've been running it ever since.

After this was all done the team got acquihired by Oracle. I was actually amazed that the team was allowed to keep the service up for some non-Oracle distro's.

But very happy to see a broader adoption of this kind of technology, it is essential for all these unmanned systems out there in the cloud that they can be patched whilst running.

I was told by Andrew Tanenbaum some time ago that Minix has had this kind of feature for a number of years now.

I prefer viewerjs.org - I don't believe it if people that say that every modern platform has a PDF viewer.

Having a document hosted on your own website together with a javascript viewer reduces the risk for users both in terms of privacy and security, as Acrobat Reader is a seriously problematic piece of code and all the remote code is a serious violation of trust between the user and the owner of the site.

I think it would be more suitable to not allow any Javascript to be used on the website. As an avid NoScript user that is how I like my sites anyway ;)

There are many more public DNS servers out there, too many to block.There is a nice comprehensive list here:

http://public-dns.tk/

You might also be interested in https://dnscrypt.eu.

I would love a port of Py-GNUTLS to the current GNUTLS. That is badly needed, as there have been major changes.

This is used by many interesting projects, like Blink (http://icanblink.com)

Why not use something like Hood.ie?

http://blog.hood.ie/2013/11/say-hello-to-offline-first/

I think it would be fairly easy to whip up something like this with WebODF (http://webodf.org). That is able to show real spreadsheet documents from software like Excel, LibreOffice, Apache OpenOffice and Calligra. Of course that works if you move away from the binary formats and choose OpenDocument Format - but this is default in most (and at least in Europe also one of the defaults of the latest two versions of Microsoft Office).

You want to use something like TLSpool (http://www.tlspool.org) and DANE. For a browser something like Firefox's Certificate Patrol is a great solution.

I agree that the term is bad taste and not really a good metaphor anyway. Slavery was about people trading and legally owning other people, and nowadays refers to a certain type of adult relationship. Both of them do not adequately describe what compsci master-slave aims to convey - e.g. an asymetric cloning strategy from an original.

I'd be happy for the term to be scrapped.

I think the opposite is true. Don't make me join Facebook or Twitter to use any service. I won't. And not offering something without joining some other service and reporting your online life to specific profiling companies (tying your fate to them) makes you want to scream "Mozilla Persona" at them.

With a small caveat for HTML5 apps where you can install a verified version of specific code you trust in your browser or your phone. And Node.js applications which run on the server side in a controllable version.

But above is just a nuance. I agree on the basic idea when it comes to Javascript you run in the browser, it is a lost battle - unless I get a SHA256 of every version of every javascript library and compare to that, and disallow other unreadable (random emscripten junk) scripts on random pages you visit while browsing. That is why I have NoScript installed, and only allow handpicked sites to run javascript in the browser.

If only we would have had the declarative approach (I still am a little grumpy that the browser makers abandoned W3C and the far better designed declarative technology XHTML2 + XForms to pursue what is now HTML5).

This is called certificate pinning (a.k.a. Trust On First Use or TOFU). If you use Firefox, just install Certificate Patrol.

If you are interested in the rationale, and how you can use technologies like DANE to make it even better, read the paper by Gabor Toth and Tjebbe Vlieg (http://staff.science.uva.nl/~delaat/rp/2012-2013/p56/report....).