kyle_martin1

This is political. Keep it off hacker news.

Managed to make a massive cursor and it was broadcasted to the whole party. Had some fun hacking this with Chrome dev tools.

Was simple as breakpointing in dev tools on "mousewheel", setting h.scale = 15, and then resuming. Massive cursor and massive fun. I'm sure people were wondering how I got mine so big. Considering it was clamped to 1.

I've thought about injecting a non-zero number to crash the app or perhaps inject some XSS to run some fun code on everyone's machine but...I decided to be nice and not literally crash the party. ;-)

All that's needed to fix this "exploit" is to properly sanitize data on the way in. Classic example of why sanitizing I/O is important!

All in all-- fun app OP.

Agreed. The title should be neutralized to something like “Elon Musk offers to purchase Twitter for $43B”

This is common in modern embedded devices. Sometimes they're called eFuses.

https://imxdev.gitlab.io/tutorial/Burning_eFuses_on_i.MX/

I think he’s implying that the investment of time must be so large to do something like this that it couldn’t just be a hobby.

And hide the White House's like to dislike ratio. Check out some videos-- the ratio is horrible: https://www.youtube.com/c/WhiteHouse/videos

Sounds like they're taking "you're not allowed to disagree" from 1984 to heart.

Please explain. All you said said was “I disagree”.

Then use useful idiots (Twitter users) for your political advantage.

Historical context: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.robesonian.com/opinion/1359...

Here’s what the White House has to say:

https://twitter.com/jasonrantz/status/1449144813291331588

Source article: Psaki Defends Rising Prices: ‘Good Thing’ Because It Means ‘More People Are Buying Goods’ https://www.dailywire.com/news/psaki-defends-rising-prices-g...

"Deplatforming" is just a roundabout way of saying "you're not welcome here because we don't agree with your speech".

YouTube's criteria of what is and is not harmful is the issue.

That's like saying KGB officers are just following orders. They're complicit implementors.

YouTube makes opinionated decisions about what gets in their search results. They edit their search results and have a team that decides that goes on the front page. That's editing. YouTube is a publisher.

Deciding what is right or wrong is the issue. YouTube isn’t transparent nor consistent about this. Social Media are publications due to their extreme efforts in curating content and speech topics. They need to be regulated as such.

Silencing people and pretending it’s OK is not going to work. It’s a double edge sword. Because one day they’re going to silence you. The math doesn’t work out long term.

Right. That's why folks are moving from Texas to California. Oh wait...

Yeah I had this theory too and was recently introduced to the term. Turns out no idea is original.

This site is pretty good: https://anacyclosis.org/portfolio/what-is-anacyclosis/

Conservatives believe the USA is in the early stages of collapse. I happen to agree with them.

Congratulations! You discovered a gem of history-- it repeats itself. Look up theory of Anacyclosis.

As a Texan, don't move here if you do not intend to adopt our culture. You have 49 other options after all.

Why was this flagged? Oh the irony.

It has better cameras. Higher dynamic range which means it can handle tunnels, shade, etc. better. The cameras can also see further which means the possibility for traffic light behavior in the future.

I agree with you but...you're also not claiming you're project/product is open source.

I use my comma two everyday. Works great. Support from the company is non-existent.

I'm kind of pissed because I bought it in the last few months and now they've come out with another one. There should be a trade-in and upgrade program.

Not actually open source. The source code that’s available is a thin wrapper around a closed-source ML model. If George really cared about Open Source he would release the training architecture and training data.

You're saying Google is the same as a small family business?

If that's the case then there's no reasonable discussion to be had here...

The very worst things in history were actually censored. Ever considered this?

Your argument about "worst of humanity" could equally apply to the best of humanity with free speech.

In fact...who are you to decide what is good speech and bad speech?

How do I know the site owner’s own biases? They’re defining their own spectrum which is inherently biased.

I don’t think there such a thing as objective journalism—- there is only who is honest about the lens from which they view the world.

For instance, CNN is left leaning and Fox is right leaning. They should just explicitly state their viewpoint so viewers can calibrate how much credence they give to unsourced claims and see past the political posturing.

Local news stations get their agenda for their parent companies. They are told what to cover, what not to cover, and how to cover things to fit the overarching narrative from executives/producers.

Well, communism is heavily documented in history books.