kvdmolen

Looks interesting. How does it compare to Dgraph? Both in features and in performance?

I'll definitely bookmark this. Though how is it different from 3DHubs (cnc, print, injection) or Shapeways (print)?

The templates seem to be non-responsive?

Where you would make a difference, at least in Europe, is an integrated multi-lingual (and multi-currency) feature. One where you can translate objects (h1, text, message) instead of creating a copy of some page. None of your competitors (which are many) get this right.

I like your UX, but just curious, what is your usp compared to all those notion, caspio, zenkit, quickbase, ninox, airtable, and more platforms out there?

Lab-grown meat ordering page. Hyperloop ticket sales website. Daily personal diet recipe. Group consensus platform. Factual information sharing

Would love to get in touch with you as we are developing a tool at this moment, exactly for this purpose. Target is a cross between jira and notion. your experience is valuable, and you would be granted life-free usage.

Edit: Agree with afarrell though a good tool should guide processes and be actively used also in operations for information And knowledge not to be dated.

@kvdmolen

Good remark, fully agree. Though I was actually referring to user experience here (so a well built sugar-coating if you will :)

Exactly, there are always a few idiots who like the idea (if built well). From there you can grow.

I'm founder of https://www.fundo.co/ and some things sound terribly familiar. However, I think it starts with deciding who you make your product for in this case, as application of this kind of product is tremendous (imagine making a list of things you can do with Excel).

As mentioned here, I don't see this razor-sharp focus in Fieldbook, which could be the reason of missing traction?

Fundo is about to undergo a major transformation, exactly for the reason of simplicity..