38 karma · joined December 10, 2012
Toy systems, yes. Hey, I too, think CircuitPython is really neat. But I'm skeptical someone would base a PLC (or similar) on it.
The triangular visualizations are kinda nifty.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Research#CP/M-86_and_D...
I lost any respect for the writer with that sentence.
- learned things at their previous founding attempt/s
- serial entrepreneurs probably have their act together
In no part of heaven does your data go poof and disappear if some 3rd party company goes under.
In no part of heaven is privacy of your data at the mercy of a 3rd party, that doesn't share your interests.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Max_Planck
often summarized as "Science advances one funeral at a time."
The central idea is:
Instead of asking one particular server for some content, just ask for the content by name.
Since the content may come from any handy server, it is up to the receiver to validate it is really the content he requested. Nothing about this implies the evil "centralized security model" people are going on about. Sure, some bad actor could weasel it in later, but it's not there now.In particular, the telling error message is:
%MLSCEF-DFC4-7-FIB_EXCEPTION: FIB TCAM exception, Some entries will be software switched
I can't be the only one who thought of this when reading the article's title :)
The irony is amazing.
Parse error at (line 1, column 1): unexpected end of input expecting reserved word 'module', reserved word 'import' or at least one datatype or variable definition